2016
DOI: 10.1177/1464700116645878
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Border thinking and disidentification: Postcolonial and postsocialist feminist dialogues

Abstract: In the context of the continuing dominance of delocalised Western feminist theoretical models, which allow the non-Western and not quite Western 'others' to either be epistemically annihilated or appropriated, it becomes crucial to look for transformative feminist theoretical tools which can eventually help break the so-called mere recognition patterns and move in the direction of transversal dialogues, mutual learning practices and volatile but effective feminist coalitions. Speaking from the position of post… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps, rather than address the question why Western feminist theory does not embrace Southern feminist theory, we need to ask why people insist that feminist theory is by default Western? Cultivating a critical distance from the story of feminism as intrinsically Western and claiming space for a dialogic praxis demands developing new analytical tools to disrupt dominant logics and imaginaries in knowledge production (see Tlostanova, Thapar-Björkert, and Koobak 2016).…”
Section: Habitus and Entitlementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps, rather than address the question why Western feminist theory does not embrace Southern feminist theory, we need to ask why people insist that feminist theory is by default Western? Cultivating a critical distance from the story of feminism as intrinsically Western and claiming space for a dialogic praxis demands developing new analytical tools to disrupt dominant logics and imaginaries in knowledge production (see Tlostanova, Thapar-Björkert, and Koobak 2016).…”
Section: Habitus and Entitlementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My starting point for this map-making exercise that attempts to chart the contours of local feminisms in Estonia is the observation that along the changing localglobal axis, the specificity of Eastern European positioning and the postsocialist condition in particular tends to disappear within transnational feminist theorizing (Koobak 2013;Koobak and Marling 2014a;Tlostanova, Thapar-Björkert, and Koobak 2016). In my experience, thinking about Eastern Europe is incredibly challenging.…”
Section: Theoretical Maps and Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How do we maintain a transversal dialogue between and across the North and the South, the East and the West, and how do we make them hear each other and find their intersections? As I have elaborated elsewhere with my colleagues Madina Tlostanova and Suruchi Thapar-Björkert (2016), one option is to make our own body-politics and geo-politics of knowledge transparent as one of the tools of successful decolonizing of gender, of thinking and of being. It means starting precisely with one's own positioning -I am where I think (Mignolo 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Maps and Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kritika směřuje především k feministickým teoretičkám ze zemí "centra" (Blagojevic 2005;De Haan, Daskalova, Loutfi 2006;Gal, Kligman 2000;Loutfi 2009). Epistemologické dopady těchto nerovností, které jsou zakoušeny a uplatňovány na různých úrov-ních, byly také podrobeny studiu (Phipps, 2016;Tlostanova, Thapar-Björkert, Koobak, 2016), včetně otázek týkajících se ne/možnosti spolupráce z důvodu geopolitické odlišnosti. To všechno je důležité pro zvážení možnosti feministické pedagogiky jako situovaného procesu, a to především v kontextu, který zdůrazňuje údajnou odlišnost a těží z ní.…”
Section: Prostředí Výuky a Učení Zahraničního Studijního Programuunclassified