Border sexualities, border families in schools

Gerouki, Margarita

doi:10.1080/14681811.2012.707381

Cited by 5 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Research data demonstrate that social views oppose CNM relationships. More over, polyamorous individuals report their stigmatizing (e.g., rejection from friends) and discriminating (e.g., child custody issues) experiences because of the traditional hegemonic patriarchal family social ideal (Kimberly & Hans, 2017;Pallotta-Chiarolli, 2010). In addition, like samesex relationships, polyamorous partnerships are faced with discrimination since they are excluded from accessing their legal rights guaranteed by mononormative institutions such as marriage and dyadic definitions of the family institution (Sheff, 2014).…”

Section: Palabras Clavementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Empirical data reveal the stigmatization of polyamorous parents and parents in other complex multi-adult family units, as well as a lack of representation in legal systems, despite shifting attitudes towards sexual-and gender-minority individuals (Pallotta-Chiarolli, 2010;Pallotta-Chiarolli et al, 2020). Additionally, without legal representation, polyamorous parents are vulnerable to custody disputes that might endanger their relationships with their children in situations of parental separation (Kleese, 2019).…”

Section: The Impact Of the Monogamous Ideal On Polyamorous Relationshipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Investigaciones anteriores muestran que la opinión social se opone a las relaciones NMC. Asimismo, las personas que practican el poliamor denuncian su estigmatización (e.g., el rechazo de sus amistades) y discriminación (e.g., problemas de custodia de los hijos) causadas por el ideal social de la familia patriarcal hegemónica tradicional (Kimberly & Hans, 2017;Pallotta-Chiarolli, 2010). Asimismo, como en las relaciones homosexuales, las relaciones poliamorosas se enfrentan a situaciones de discriminación puesto que se les niega el acceso a derechos legales garantizados por instituciones mononormativas tales como el matrimonio y las definiciones diádicas de la familia (Sheff, 2014).…”

Section: Limitationsunclassified

“…Datos empíricos confirman la estigmatización de los progenitores de familias poliamorosas y en otro tipo de unidades familiares múltiples complejas, así como su falta de representación en sistemas legales, pese a los cambios recientes en las actitudes hacia los miembros de las minorías de género (Pallotta-Chiarolli, 2010;Pallotta-Chiarolli et al, 2020). Además, sin representación legal, los progenitores en relaciones poliamorosas son vulnerables a disputas sobre la custodia que podrían poner en peligro las relaciones con sus hijos en caso de separación (Kleese, 2019).…”

Section: El Impacto Del Ideal Monógamo En Las Relaciones Poliamorosasunclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Beyond the presumption of monogamy: the role of religiosity, political conservatism and mononormativity in motivating opposition towards poly families / Más allá de la presunción de monogamia: el rol de la religiosidad, el conservadurismo político y la mononormatividad como motivadores de la oposición hacia las polifamilias

Grigoropoulos

2024

International Journal of Social Psychology: Revista de Psicolog

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In light of the current discussion concerning poly families’ rights, this study examined the motivational underpinnings of opposition to poly families. Grounded on the theoretical line that institutional and ideological systems can legitimize the ostracism of stigmatized groups, the current exploratory research project examined the relationship between religiosity and opposition to poly families and whether this relationship is mediated by political positioning and mononormativity in a serial fashion. Specifically, Study 1 ( N = 277) examined the effect of religiosity on opposition towards polyamorous parents and whether the endorsement of conservative ideology and mononormativity would mediate this relationship. Study 2 ( N = 193) replicated the first study’s findings using a behavioural expression of negative stigma towards poly families’ rights. Study 1 showed that opposition towards poly families might be affected by religiosity and that the impact of religiosity is mediated by conservative ideology and mononormativity. Study 2 showed that religiosity could affect opposition to poly families’ rights through conservative ideology and mononormativity. This study provides evidence that the more religious participants are likely to express attitudinal and behavioural opposition towards poly families and that the more religious participants endorsed ideas based on conservative and mononormativity principles, the more they opposed poly families. The current exploratory study shows the relation between system-justifying ideological manifestations in prejudice towards poly families.

show abstract

Section: Palabras Clavementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Impact Of the Monogamous Ideal On Polyamorous Relationshipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Limitationsunclassified

Section: El Impacto Del Ideal Monógamo En Las Relaciones Poliamorosasunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Beyond the presumption of monogamy: the role of religiosity, political conservatism and mononormativity in motivating opposition towards poly families / Más allá de la presunción de monogamia: el rol de la religiosidad, el conservadurismo político y la mononormatividad como motivadores de la oposición hacia las polifamilias

Grigoropoulos

2024

International Journal of Social Psychology: Revista de Psicolog

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Much like gay parents, CNM parents have found themselves the victims of discrimination [41] and suffer from a lack of legal protection and recognition in many contexts [42]. Highlighting the intersection between race and CNM, some research with Aboriginal families in Australia argues that racism exacerbates the likelihood of state intervention [43]. As with any minority group, the fear of the damage that stigmatisation may have on children often leads parents to adopt strategies of secretness in order to "pass".…”

Section: How Is Consensual Non-monogamy Regarded?mentioning

confidence: 99%

What do we know about consensual non-monogamy?

Scoats

Campbell²

2022

Current Opinion in Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Consensually nonmonogamous parent relationships during COVID-19

Manley

Goldberg

2021

Sexualities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the COVID-19 pandemic, parents in consensually nonmonogamous (CNM) relationships navigated public health directives to social distance and avoid contact between households. Many parents practicing CNM share romantic, sexual, and coparenting relationships across households, and the pandemic introduced challenges and opportunities for innovation in maintaining connection. This qualitative study sought to explore the experiences, challenges, and adaptations of CNM parents, using survey and interview data from 70 US parents collected between May and December 2020. Thematic analysis highlighted that many parents spent less time with non-cohabiting partners and more time with cohabiting partners and children, but also adapted via creative strategies such as incorporating partners into a quarantine pod, inviting partners to move in, or connecting over technology. These data illuminate the diverse ways that CNM parents engaged in and “queered” family and partner relationships during the pandemic.

show abstract

Border sexualities, border families in schools

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

What do we know about consensual non-monogamy?

Consensually nonmonogamous parent relationships during COVID-19

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About