2002
DOI: 10.17487/rfc3345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Persistent Route Oscillation Condition

Abstract: In particular configurations, the BGP scaling mechanisms defined in "BGP Route Reflection -An Alternative to Full Mesh IBGP" and "Autonomous System Confederations for BGP" will introduce persistent BGP route oscillation. This document discusses the two types of persistent route oscillation that have been identified, describes when these conditions will occur, and provides some network design guidelines to avoid introducing such occurrences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note however, that there are permanent BGP route oscillation scenarios [RFC3345] that the mechanism described in this document does not eliminate. , and (c) are as described in Figure 2.…”
Section: The Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Note however, that there are permanent BGP route oscillation scenarios [RFC3345] that the mechanism described in this document does not eliminate. , and (c) are as described in Figure 2.…”
Section: The Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The first is the problem of BGP oscillations [RFC3345]. The second is the desire for faster reachability restoration in the event of failure of the network link or network element.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, confederations (as well as route reflectors), by excluding different reachability information from consideration at different locations in a confederation, have been shown [RFC3345] to cause permanent oscillation between candidate routes when using the tie-breaking rules required by BGP [BGP-4]. Care must be taken when selecting MED values and tie-breaking policy to avoid these situations.…”
Section: Deployment Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%