1957
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1957.00021962004900070011x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Border Effects in Winter Wheat and Spring Oat Tests1

Abstract: Synopsis A 2‐foot border between plots resulted in a highly significant border effect in 3 winter wheat and 1 spring oat test. A significant border × variety interaction was obtained in 2 of the 4 tests. Weight per bushel was lower in all spring oat border rows than in center rows. Winter wheat border rows produced grain of approximately the same weight per bushel as center rows.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1000-grain weight was the least affected. Similar results were found by Bhalli et al (1964) and Brown & Weibel (1957).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…1000-grain weight was the least affected. Similar results were found by Bhalli et al (1964) and Brown & Weibel (1957).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…volume weight, 1000-grain weight and oil content) the scores for the outer rows were only 0-2 % different from those for the central rows. The 1000-grain weight of cereals also showed only a small edge effect in other studies (Brown & Weibel 1957;Bhalli et al 1964;Hadjichristodoulou 1983). However, as the differences in edge effects between species for DM content, HI, volume weight, 1000-grain weight and nitrogen content of grain and straw were significant in two to eight of the ten trials, it is better to measure these characters on the central rows of the plot only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A plottype by cultivar yield interaction was therefore possible. Such interactions were detected by Harrington (941) and Brown & Weibel (1957), but were erratice. Hall & Wallace (1975) also found yield discrepancies which suggested thar cultivar yields could be influenced by different harvesting machinery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%