Border Disputes in Southeast Asia and Their Impact on the Regional Integration Process

Kraus, Filip

doi:10.1163/9789004312180_004

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…But the matter is more challengeable in the Exclusive Economic Zone and High Sea, where pirate can easily target the cargo and ship of any country which is using for international trade. (Kraus, 2017) All coastal states are required to have a check and look on their Exclusive Economic Zone and High Sea. Although the coastal states have no sovereignty but have sovereign rights in the said zones but it is clear that EEZ and High Sea is the adjacent areas of coastal states.…”

Section: Responsibilities Of Coastal States For Trade Protectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Snags of Maritime Piracy Facing the Maritime Trade: Implications for the Blue Economy and Maritime Laws

Talha

2023

JDSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The danger of piracy has been around for ages, and this fact is worth highlighting. Because it has been legalized and then declared illegal over the course of several centuries, it will be difficult to eradicate totally in a short period of time. However, this does not indicate that it is impossible to remove. Positive prospects and initiatives for secure trade, both regional and international, are necessary for the eradication of piracy. The coastal state bears a heavy burden for ensuring the security of maritime trade in the event of criminal activity at sea. Most maritime crimes are committed by locals (criminals) who are citizens of the country where the crimes occurred, hence coastal states need to keep a tight eye on their neighboring zones. The growth of international trade depends on the elimination of piracy. UNCLOS 1982 states that all nations must work together to combat maritime piracy on international waters. Pirates today may seize ships in places like Somalia and Africa, but they conduct negotiations, ransom talks, and other business in more industrialized nations. To eliminate this threat, all advanced and developed governments must work together to enact legislation that is mutually advantageous for all states so that they may maximize their use of the ocean's free resources.

show abstract

Section: Responsibilities Of Coastal States For Trade Protectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Controversy about border security and the 2008 fighting between Thailand and Cambodia. Because of these differences, working together is hampered (Kraus, 2017).…”

Section: Cross Boarder Issues -General Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Snags of Maritime Piracy Facing the Maritime Trade: Implications for the Blue Economy and Maritime Laws

Talha

2023

JDSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Blancard (2003) notes that these disputes can foster aggressive foreign policies, particularly in domestically unstable countries. Local politicians often exploit border disputes for rhetoric and policy, leading to prolonged conflicts (Kraus, 2017). The Thai-Cambodian conflict over…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What ASEAN Must Learn from Timor-Leste: A Tripartite Analysis on Australian Foreign Policy Related to Timor Sea Treaty 2018

Kusumawardhana,

Saptarani Dewi

2024

J. ASEAN Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Timor Gap had been a hotspot of territorial dispute between Australia and Timor-Leste. In 2018, Australia finally agreed to settle a permanent maritime boundary in favour of Timor-Leste. Why was Australia willing to sacrifice the border and give a favourable outcome to Timor-Leste? The research examined the importance of the tripartite approach to Foreign Policy analysis to understand why a country may choose seemingly unfavourable options in territorial disputes. The analysis showed how Australian foreign policy was influenced by agency-structure interactions within the international system. The research demonstrated that structural constraints at the international level influenced Australia’s decision, including the South China Sea dispute between ASEAN members and China, previous agreements Australia-Timor-Leste on the management of the Timor Gap, and domestic political dynamics in Australia. The research reveals a relationship between actors’ structural and dispositional dimensions in foreign policy. In the case of Australia, there is a strong link between democratic values and respect for the international rules-based order. Altogether, this situation prompted Australia to continue negotiations with Timor-Leste over the Timor Gap and ultimately to accept an agreement for maritime delimitation in Timor-Leste’s favor.

show abstract

Cambodia and the Politics of Populism and Nationalism in the South China Sea

Chandarith

Sreysour

2022

Populism, Nationalism and South China Sea Dispute

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Border Disputes in Southeast Asia and Their Impact on the Regional Integration Process

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

The Snags of Maritime Piracy Facing the Maritime Trade: Implications for the Blue Economy and Maritime Laws

The Snags of Maritime Piracy Facing the Maritime Trade: Implications for the Blue Economy and Maritime Laws

What ASEAN Must Learn from Timor-Leste: A Tripartite Analysis on Australian Foreign Policy Related to Timor Sea Treaty 2018

Cambodia and the Politics of Populism and Nationalism in the South China Sea

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About