2010
DOI: 10.1080/10485250903556102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bootstrapping the NPMLE for doubly truncated data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it is often natural to utilize distributional assumptions of the truncation limits into estimation. In particular, the assumptions that the left-truncation limit u * i is a realization from a uniform distribution, and the right-truncation limit is v * i = u * i +d 0 , where d 0 > 0 is a constant, are often plausible in doubly-truncated data (Stovring and Wang 2007;Moreira and de Uña-Álvarez 2010). A related paper is De Uña-álvarez (2004) who constructed a moment-based estimator which is more efficient than the NPMLE when u * i follows a uniform distribution, and v * i = u * i +d 0 is a right-censoring limit (instead of right-truncation limit).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, it is often natural to utilize distributional assumptions of the truncation limits into estimation. In particular, the assumptions that the left-truncation limit u * i is a realization from a uniform distribution, and the right-truncation limit is v * i = u * i +d 0 , where d 0 > 0 is a constant, are often plausible in doubly-truncated data (Stovring and Wang 2007;Moreira and de Uña-Álvarez 2010). A related paper is De Uña-álvarez (2004) who constructed a moment-based estimator which is more efficient than the NPMLE when u * i follows a uniform distribution, and v * i = u * i +d 0 is a right-censoring limit (instead of right-truncation limit).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data have been analyzed previously. Moreira and de Uña-Álvarez (2010) and nonparametrically estimated the distribution function and survival function, respectively, based on the NPMLE. Hu and Emura (2015) performed model selection among the pool of parametric models, and concluded that the cubic SEF gives the best fit.…”
Section: Data Analysis 61 the Childhood Cancer Data (Moreira And De mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreira and de Uña-Álvarez [13] demonstrated that the simple bootstrap is a suitable method to estimate the finite sample distribution of the NPMLE. Specifically, we draw a simple random sample n) with replacement from the original doubly truncated data with equal probability 1/n.…”
Section: The Proposed Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available results, Shen (2008), do no provide answers to important practical issues such as the computation of standard errors and the construction of confidence limits. Moreira and de Uña-Álvarez (2010) proposed the simple bootstrap as a suitable method to approximate the finite sample distribution of the NPMLE for doubly truncated data, extending the ideas in Gross and Lai (1996) for the one-sided truncated scenario. Gross and Lai (1996) and Moreira and de Uña-Álvarez (2010) also presented a critical comparison with the obvious bootstrap method.…”
Section: Bootstrap Approximation Of the Npmlementioning
confidence: 99%