2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11222-012-9370-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bootstrapping and permuting paired t-test type statistics

Abstract: We study various bootstrap and permutation methods for matched pairs, whose distributions can have different shapes even under the null hypothesis of no treatment effect. Although the data may not be exchangeable under the null, we investigate different permutation approaches as valid procedures for finite sample sizes. It will be shown that permutation or bootstrap schemes, which neglect the dependency structure in the data, are asymptotically valid. Simulation studies show that these new tests improve the po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, resampling data with replacement from the pooled data would increase more resampling variability than resampling data with replacement within each group separately under matched/paired design. A recent study referred this pooled approach as a counterintuitive resampling strategy for paired group comparison and showed asymptotically valid for comparing means [23]. In this study, the null hypothesis being tested is that the means of underlying distributions are the same, that is, H 0 : μ 1 = μ 2 for comparison of two groups or H 0 : μ1 = μ2 = μ3 for comparison of three groups, where μ i is the mean for i th group, i = (1,2,3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, resampling data with replacement from the pooled data would increase more resampling variability than resampling data with replacement within each group separately under matched/paired design. A recent study referred this pooled approach as a counterintuitive resampling strategy for paired group comparison and showed asymptotically valid for comparing means [23]. In this study, the null hypothesis being tested is that the means of underlying distributions are the same, that is, H 0 : μ 1 = μ 2 for comparison of two groups or H 0 : μ1 = μ2 = μ3 for comparison of three groups, where μ i is the mean for i th group, i = (1,2,3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of assessed embryos should not be neglected. We thus used a random permutation testing approach[37], accounting for these challenges and opportunities, to assess the significance of differences in embryopathy rates between matched left and right uterine horn pairs, across mothers. This approach has the advantages of (i) stemming naturally from the natural pairing between uterine horns, (ii) not requiring a specific sample distribution, and (iii) accounting for the inherently unbalanced pairing between uterine horns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Janssen (, ) proposes studentized permutation tests for the parametric Behrens–Fisher problem, whereas Fay and Proschan () discuss test recommendations in both Behrens–Fisher problems. Moreover, Janssen (,b), Pauly (), Konietschke and Pauly (, ), Omelka and Pauly (), Chung and Romano (, ), as well as Pauly et al. () support the use of studentized permutation tests for other testing problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%