2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2018.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bootstrap estimation of uncertainty in prediction for generalized linear mixed models

Abstract: In this article, we focus on the estimation of the Mean Squared Error for the Predictors (MSEP) of Random Effects (RE) in Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) by means of non-parametric bootstrap methods. In the frequentist paradigm, the MSEP is used as a measure of the uncertainty in prediction and has been shown to be affected by the estimation of the model parameters. In the particular case of linear mixed models (LMM), two solutions are provided to practitioners: on one hand, secondorder correct approxim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that EC's relationship with the N constituents weakens as EC increases, given that many PWW constituents contribute to salinity of the water. These error ranges are larger than those calculated using classic methods (Flores-Agreda & Cantoni, 2019). Thus, accuracy gains simulated using these numbers can be considered conservative.…”
Section: N Application Uncertainty Using Ec-proxymentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is likely that EC's relationship with the N constituents weakens as EC increases, given that many PWW constituents contribute to salinity of the water. These error ranges are larger than those calculated using classic methods (Flores-Agreda & Cantoni, 2019). Thus, accuracy gains simulated using these numbers can be considered conservative.…”
Section: N Application Uncertainty Using Ec-proxymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The uncertainty of the EC-proxy measurements incorporated the heteroskedasticity of the models' residuals, which are not considered in classic methods for estimating the uncertainty of mixed model predictions (Flores-Agreda & Cantoni, 2019). In the context of the PWW lagoons, heteroskedasticity of the residuals is consistent with the limitations of EC as a proxy for the N constituents.…”
Section: N Application Uncertainty Using Ec-proxymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where f (x i ) is the forecasting values of the electricity-heat-cooling-gas load, f (x i ) is the actual regression values of the electricity-heat-cooling-gas load forecasting model, and ε(x i ) is the data noise [70].…”
Section: The Bootstrap Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, K. This means that at least p100% of realizations of absolute prediction errors for all risk factors are smaller than or equal to QMAPE p (( Ni,T+1 ) K i=1 ). Let us introduce Algorithm 1, see [28][29][30], which will be used to estimate the prediction accuracy for the considered model, where the variability of random effects will be taken into account also for the risk factors not observed in the considered dataset.…”
Section: Bootstrap Estimators Of Prediction Accuracy Measures For Claim Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%