2017
DOI: 10.1007/jhep04(2017)158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boosted dark matter at the deep underground neutrino experiment

Abstract: We investigate the detection prospects of a non-standard dark sector in the context of boosted dark matter. We consider a scenario where two stable particles have a large mass difference and the heavier particle accounts for most of dark matter in our current universe. The heavier candidate is assumed to have no interaction with the standard model particles at tree-level, hence evading existing constraints. Although subdominant, the lighter dark matter particles are efficiently produced via pair-annihilation o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(94 reference statements)
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [15] the possibility of releasing more than the recoil energy was considered, but with signals still in the domain of low threshold detectors. Other DM models [17][18][19][20][21][22][23], are similar to our scenario in that they can be probed at neutrino detectors [24]. Yet, in these models, the dynamics that lead to signals at neutrino detector (a "removal" of a baryon from the detector or a boosted population of DM) is different than the case of SDDM.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In [15] the possibility of releasing more than the recoil energy was considered, but with signals still in the domain of low threshold detectors. Other DM models [17][18][19][20][21][22][23], are similar to our scenario in that they can be probed at neutrino detectors [24]. Yet, in these models, the dynamics that lead to signals at neutrino detector (a "removal" of a baryon from the detector or a boosted population of DM) is different than the case of SDDM.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Since the expected flux of BDM from annihilation is generally small (suppressed by n 2 DM ) [49], large-volume detectors are desirable. Prospective signal sensitivities are investigated in Super-K/Hyper-K [49,50,52,63,64], DUNE [63,64], IceCube/PINGU [49,52], and LUX [65]. Surface-based detectors such as ProtoDUNE and SBN detectors may have sensitivity, restricting to the upward-going signals [68].…”
Section: Boosted Dark Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an angle cut allows to focus on signal-rich regions hence improve signal sensitivities. Example studies include Sun-originating BDM [51,52,64] via the annihilation of solar-captured heavier dark matter and dwarf-galaxy-originating BDM [63]. Further background rejection for elastic scattering may be achieved by dedicated analysis on event kinematics and using the fact that unlike neutrinos, BDM events have no correlated charged current events [49].…”
Section: Boosted Dark Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other proposed searches for dark matter that deposits enough energy to exceed the ∼ MeV threshold of neutrino detectors include dark matter that destroys target baryons [6][7][8][9], that yields annihilation or decay products detectable in these experiments [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], that deposits its entire (mass + kinetic) energy [21], is produced at high-intensity accelerators or radioactive sources [22], is accelerated by astrophysical sources [23], or is bounced off energetic cosmic rays [24,25]. All these approaches (excepting the last one) require specific models with a number of massive dark sector states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%