Book Reviews : The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism

Esping‐Andersen, Gøsta; Standing, Guy

doi:10.1177/095892879100100108

Cited by 2,187 publications

(801 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

692

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In theoretical terms, whilst all welfare states are designed to address issues of inequality, they do so in different ways and to different extents (Esping-Andersen, 1990). Empirically, this has been demonstrated in a number of studies.…”

Section: Individuals and Regionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Welfare state regimes and differences in self-perceived health in Europe: A multilevel analysis

Eikemo

Bambra

Judge

et al. 2008

Social Science & Medicine

255

216

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. AbstractThe aim of this study was to determine the degree to which welfare state regime characteristics explained the proportional variation of self-perceived health betweenEuropean countries, when individual and regional variation was accounted for, by undertaking a multilevel analysis of the European Social Survey (2002 and

show abstract

Section: Individuals and Regionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Welfare state regimes and differences in self-perceived health in Europe: A multilevel analysis

Eikemo

Bambra

Judge

et al. 2008

Social Science & Medicine

255

216

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The main distinction is made by whether they favour traditional families, market reliance or mother"s employment. This typology groups countries similarly to the well-known overall welfare typology of Esping-Andersen (1990). The difference however, is that the focus here solely is on institutional dimensions of family policy.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does non-employment contribute to the health disadvantage among lone mothers in Britain, Italy and Sweden? Synergy effects and the meaning of family policy

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study analyses self-rated health and non-employment and potential synergy effects among lone and couple mothers aged 25-59 in Britain, Sweden and Italy, representing different family policy categories using data from national surveys (2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005). Synergy effects on health were calculated by synergy index. Non-employment only marginally contributed to the excess risk of poor health among lone mothers but there were synergy effects between lone motherhood and nonemployment in all three countries, producing a higher risk of poor health than would be expected from a simple addition of these exposures. Results are discussed in relation to the different family policy and living contexts. Responses to reviewer # 3's comments: The title would read better if "contribute to" is replaced by "associated with". Consider also omitting the subtitle. Response:We have changed the title accordingly, and altered the subtitle. The new title reads: "Is non-employment associated with the health disadvantage among lone mothers in Britain, Italy and Sweden? Family policy and synergy effects" Avoid causal arguments and terminology throughout the text ("causal", "impact", "effect" etc.). Response: We have searched the text for causal arguments and terminology, and changed the wording where we thought it appropriate, and kept the wording when referring to other studies where this terminology has been used. Use "employment" instead of "work" wherever appropriate. Response: We have gone through the article and change wherever appropriate. The country specific analyses have been separately conducted and therefore avoid direct comparisons of countries in terms of the levels of risk (OR). Interactions would be needed for direct country comparisons. Response: We agree and have made alterations in the text. The second para of Discussion says "Non-employment only partly explained.". In my mind the explanation was minimal. Response: We agree and have changed this to: "Non-employment only marginally contributed to the excess risk…." 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 Response to Reviewers AbstractThis study analyses self-rated health and non-employment and potential synergy effects among lone and couple mothers aged 25-59 in Britain, Sweden and Italy, representing different family policy categories using data from national surveys (2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005). Synergy effects on health were calculated by synergy index. Non-employment only marginally contributed to the excess risk of poor health among lone mothers but there were synergy effects between lone motherhood and non-employment in all three countries, producing a higher risk of poor health than would be expected from a simple addition of these exposures.Results are discussed in relation to the different family policy and living co...

show abstract

“…Moreover, Papanastasiou and Papatheodorou (2010), Papatheodorou and Papanastasiou (2010) and Papanastasiou et al (2016) found evidence of extensive ITP in south European countries contrary to northwestern countries (and especially the Nordic ones). The patterning in ITP outcomes across the EU that was found by those researchers leads to a clustering of countries based on distinct and longstanding welfare states (Esping-Andersen, 1990;Liebfried, 1993;Ferrera, 1996. ) As also several studies have shown, the cross-country differences in poverty and inequality in the EU are largely attributed to the social protection system that each member-state has developed (Papatheodorou and Petmesidou, 2004;2005;Papatheodorou et al, 2008;Dafermos and Papatheodorou, 2010;Papatheodorou and Dafermos, 2010;Dafermos and Papatheodorou, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…These countries represent the four welfare state regimes according to Esping-Andersen's (1990) typology and the following debate on the welfare regime of the southEuropean countries (Leibfried, 1993;Ferrera, 1996;Papatheodorou and Petmesidou, 2004;2005). That is, Denmark, France, Great Britain and Greece represent the social-democratic, the corporatistconservative, the liberal and the south-European welfare regime respectively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Causal pathways of intergenerational poverty transmission in selected EU countries

Papanastasiou

Papatheodorou

2018

SCAD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Αιτιώδεις διαδροµές της διαγενεακής µεταβίβασης της φτώχειας σε επιλεγµένες χώρες της ΕΕ Στέφανος Παπαναστασίου, ∆ηµοκρίτειο Πανεπιστήµιο Θράκης Χρίστος Παπαθεοδώρου, Πάντειο Πανεπιστήµιο ΠΕΡIΛΗΨΗ Το άρθρο διερευνά εάν, µε ποιο τρόπο και σε ποιο βαθµό η οικογένεια προέλευσης επηρεάζει τον κίνδυ-νο φτώχειας των απογόνων σε επιλεγµένες χώρες της ΕΕ που αντιπροσωπεύουν διαφορετικά συστήµατα κοινωνικής προστασίας. Κάνοντας χρήση logit µοντέ-λων και αξιοποιώντας µικροδεδοµένα από την EU-SILC, η ανάλυση αναδεικνύει τη σηµασία της κοινω-νικής προστασίας για την αναχαίτιση της διαγενεακής µεταβίβασης της φτώχειας. Η ∆ανία µε το σοσιαλδηµο-κρατικό κράτος πρόνοιας είναι η πιο επιτυχηµένη στην άµβλυνση της επίδρασης της οικογένειας προέλευσης στον κίνδυνο φτώχειας των παιδιών, ακολουθούµενη από την Γαλλία που αντιπροσωπεύει το συντηρητικό-κορπορατιστικό καθεστώς ευηµερίας. Λιγότερο αποτε-λεσµατικές σε αυτό το ζήτηµα εµφανίζονται η Ελλάδα και η Μεγάλη Βρετανία που αντιπροσωπεύουν το νοτι-οευρωπαϊκό και το φιλελεύθερο σύστηµα κοινωνικής προστασίας αντίστοιχα. ΛΕΞΕΙΣ-ΚΛΕΙ∆ΙΑ:Φτώχεια, διαγενεακή κινητικό-τητα, διαγενεακή µεταβίβαση φτώχειας, γονεϊκό υπόβαθρο, κοινωνική προστασία, καθεστώτα ευ-ηµερίας, ΕΕ. ABSTRACT The paper investigates whether, in what wayand to what extent the family of origin affects offspring's poverty risk in selected EU countries representing different social protection systems. Employing logit models and utilizing EU-SILC data, the analysis brings to the forefront the importance of social protection for intercepting the intergenerational transmission of poverty. Denmark with the socialdemocratic welfare state is the most successful in mitigating the effect of the family of origin on offspring's poverty risk, followed by France representing the conservative-corporatist welfare regime. Less effective οn this matter appear to be Greece and Great Britain representing the south-European and the liberal social protection system respectively.

show abstract

Book Reviews : The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism

Cited by 2,187 publications

References 0 publications

Welfare state regimes and differences in self-perceived health in Europe: A multilevel analysis

Welfare state regimes and differences in self-perceived health in Europe: A multilevel analysis

Does non-employment contribute to the health disadvantage among lone mothers in Britain, Italy and Sweden? Synergy effects and the meaning of family policy

Causal pathways of intergenerational poverty transmission in selected EU countries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About