2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00706.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Book Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33.5.1), as the reference to Chemnitz (1786: 175) suggests that Gmelin was aware of the correct etymology of the species epithet. The name Helixlanschaurica has rarely been used as the valid name of a taxon (Rees 1819; Woodarch 1820; Wodarch and Mawe 1822, 1825, 1827, 1831, 1833; Bosc 1802, 1824, 1836; Pfeiffer 1840, 1841) and to our knowledge only once after 1900 (Coan and Petit 2011), whereas Helixtanschaurica is comparatively frequently used (e.g., Gmelin 1792; Frauenfeld 1864 as Helixtanschaurica ; Schmidt 1818 as Melaniatanschaurica ; Gray 1855 as Paludinatanschaurica ; Hanley and Theobald 1876; Preston 1915b; Seshaiya, 1929, 1934; Jacob 1959; Satyamurty 1960; Starobogatov 1970; Subba Rao and Mitra 1979; Brown 1980, 1994; Fretter 1984; Brown and Mandahl-Barth 1989; Daniel et al 1998; Dillon 2000; Strong and Glaubrecht 2002; Thasun Amarasinghe and Krishnarajah 2009; Strong et al 2011 as Paludomustanschaurica ; Starmühlner 1974, 1977, 1979; Subba Rao 1989 as Paludomustanschauricus ) and usually attributed to Gmelin (1791) (although sometimes with a wrong date). Paludomussanschauricus as used by Adams and Adams (1853–1854) is an incorrect subsequent spelling.…”
Section: Part 3 Species-group Namesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…33.5.1), as the reference to Chemnitz (1786: 175) suggests that Gmelin was aware of the correct etymology of the species epithet. The name Helixlanschaurica has rarely been used as the valid name of a taxon (Rees 1819; Woodarch 1820; Wodarch and Mawe 1822, 1825, 1827, 1831, 1833; Bosc 1802, 1824, 1836; Pfeiffer 1840, 1841) and to our knowledge only once after 1900 (Coan and Petit 2011), whereas Helixtanschaurica is comparatively frequently used (e.g., Gmelin 1792; Frauenfeld 1864 as Helixtanschaurica ; Schmidt 1818 as Melaniatanschaurica ; Gray 1855 as Paludinatanschaurica ; Hanley and Theobald 1876; Preston 1915b; Seshaiya, 1929, 1934; Jacob 1959; Satyamurty 1960; Starobogatov 1970; Subba Rao and Mitra 1979; Brown 1980, 1994; Fretter 1984; Brown and Mandahl-Barth 1989; Daniel et al 1998; Dillon 2000; Strong and Glaubrecht 2002; Thasun Amarasinghe and Krishnarajah 2009; Strong et al 2011 as Paludomustanschaurica ; Starmühlner 1974, 1977, 1979; Subba Rao 1989 as Paludomustanschauricus ) and usually attributed to Gmelin (1791) (although sometimes with a wrong date). Paludomussanschauricus as used by Adams and Adams (1853–1854) is an incorrect subsequent spelling.…”
Section: Part 3 Species-group Namesmentioning
confidence: 93%