2016
DOI: 10.1177/0019793916662005a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Book Review: Updating The Transformation of American Industrial Relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, there was a decline in the industrial relations system and private sector unionization in organizations (Kochan, 1986). There was also a shift from a manufacturing to a service economy, and, in the new economy, organizations viewed employees as being critical to their success.…”
Section: Client Server and Pc-based Applications (Mid-1980s-mid-1990s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, there was a decline in the industrial relations system and private sector unionization in organizations (Kochan, 1986). There was also a shift from a manufacturing to a service economy, and, in the new economy, organizations viewed employees as being critical to their success.…”
Section: Client Server and Pc-based Applications (Mid-1980s-mid-1990s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is well-documented in the sociological research on job quality (Kalleberg 2013), the industrial relations literature (Kochan, Katz, and McKersie 1986), and the management literature (Cappelli 1999). In particular, industry-based empirical research has documented how variation in employer strategies between firms in the same industry has led to variation in the quality of jobs (Appelbaum, Bernhardt, and Murnane 2003;Gautie and Schmitt 2010).…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Attempts to introduce more flexible work arrangements in American workplaces-involving more broadly defined jobs, promotion on merit rather than seniority, and pay for performance-have repeatedly brought managers and unions into conflict because they have involved rolling back formal rules and "objective" criteria used for making decisions under the older union regime (Kochan, Katz, and McKersie 1986). Studies that explore the impact of diversity practices have considered unionization as an important potential confound, because it is theorized to produce some similar changes in the employment relationship.…”
Section: Unions and Managerial Discretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seniority systems, a common component of many union contracts, dictated the order in which employers can promote and lay off workers I am constantly surprised at the number of very large companies that make personnel decisions based on highly arbitrary and subjective criteria. These latter companies are typically ones that emphasize both a strong organizational culture and union avoidance, and whose senior executives view any move toward structured policy as a threat to management discretion (Bielby 2000, p. 127).Attempts to introduce more flexible work arrangements in American workplaces-involving more broadly defined jobs, promotion on merit rather than seniority, and pay for performance-have repeatedly brought managers and unions into conflict because they have involved rolling back formal rules and "objective" criteria used for making decisions under the older union regime (Kochan, Katz, and McKersie 1986). Studies that explore the impact of diversity practices have considered unionization as an important potential confound, because it is theorized to produce some similar changes in the employment relationship.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%