2016
DOI: 10.1177/1749602015615508g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Book Review: German television studies: Cartography of a debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Work that introduces non-English-speaking scholarship, in fact, shows how the dominance of English in TV studies is far more wide-reaching than just being the language one uses to communicate to an international audience. In their review of German TV scholarship, Schmerheim and Vermeulen (2016), for example, point to the dominance of the ‘quality TV’ debate. While they argue that the German-speaking work on ‘quality TV’ has ‘much to offer to its Anglophone cousin(s)’, particularly in the form of more rigorously narrative approaches to TV fiction, they also deplore that US television appears to be a more valued research object in German scholarship than the region’s domestic TV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work that introduces non-English-speaking scholarship, in fact, shows how the dominance of English in TV studies is far more wide-reaching than just being the language one uses to communicate to an international audience. In their review of German TV scholarship, Schmerheim and Vermeulen (2016), for example, point to the dominance of the ‘quality TV’ debate. While they argue that the German-speaking work on ‘quality TV’ has ‘much to offer to its Anglophone cousin(s)’, particularly in the form of more rigorously narrative approaches to TV fiction, they also deplore that US television appears to be a more valued research object in German scholarship than the region’s domestic TV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%