1986
DOI: 10.1177/073428298600400210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Book Review: Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude (DTLA-2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DTLA-P is a shorter test, has larger spaces for writing on Letter Sequences and Object Sequences, has simpler procedures for Letter Sequences, omits Word Fragments and Story Construction which are weak parts of the DTLA-2 (Radencich, 1986), and has shorter directions. Because of a ceiling effect, the test's usefulness is limited at age 9, but the DTLA-P appears to be the better test for ages 6 through 8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DTLA-P is a shorter test, has larger spaces for writing on Letter Sequences and Object Sequences, has simpler procedures for Letter Sequences, omits Word Fragments and Story Construction which are weak parts of the DTLA-2 (Radencich, 1986), and has shorter directions. Because of a ceiling effect, the test's usefulness is limited at age 9, but the DTLA-P appears to be the better test for ages 6 through 8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%