2000
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-7321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BoneSource for Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction

Abstract: Hydroxyapatite cement (HAC) is a calcium phosphate cement whose properties overcome the inherent limitations of previous forms of hydroxyapatite. HAC (BoneSource, Leibinger Corp., Dallas, TX) is prepared as a powder that forms an easily applicable paste which hardens in six to 20 minutes. HAC exhibits excellent biocompatibility, is easily contoured in situ, is highly stable, and allows osteoconduction. The use of calcium phosphate cements (CPC) for reconstruction of craniofacial defects has intrinsic appeal ow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have also shown excellent retention of implanted volume, without any interference in the craniofacial growth for a period of approximately 3 years. Calcium phosphate cements show excellent biocompatibility, are easily mouldable in situ and allow osteoconduction (Turk and Parhiscar, 2000;Rupprecht et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have also shown excellent retention of implanted volume, without any interference in the craniofacial growth for a period of approximately 3 years. Calcium phosphate cements show excellent biocompatibility, are easily mouldable in situ and allow osteoconduction (Turk and Parhiscar, 2000;Rupprecht et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two types of cements are distinguished depending on the end product of the setting reaction : apatite and brushite (DCPD or dicalcium phosphate dihydrate) cements, of which the latter recently raises great interest 16) . Brushite cements are resorbed faster than apatite cements [8][9][10][11][12][13][15][16][17][18][19][20] , but concerning the mechanical strength, brushite calcium phosphate cement is slightly weaker than apatite calcium phosphate cement 10) . However, in the non-weight bearing conditions of the skull, the difference between two cements may be irrelevant 10) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bone bonding effect of CPC makes it possible to have a great advantage of mold and adaptation to the individual defect with no need of special fixation elements. One of the first calcium phosphate cements, Bone Source has shown positive results when it is used in craniofacial reconstruction 4,17,18) . Bone Source shows excellent retention of implant volume, with no interference of craniofacial growth over a 3-year study period for the cases of pediatric patients 6) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations