2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2019.02.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone taphonomy inside and out: Application of 3-dimensional microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and micro-computed tomography to the study of humanly modified faunal assemblages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principles facilitating our classification scheme rely on two basic assumptions: (I) Different types of ochre modifications leave surface marks with different morphologies and shapes and (II) the morphometrics of different marks can be reliably measured and quantified through the microtopographic profile analysis. Although similar assumptions have been thoroughly tested and found to be correct within the anthropogenic cutmark analysis of bone (Bello & Galway‐Witham, 2019; Bello & Soligo, 2008), up until now, they have not been assessed in the context of surface modifications on ochre.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The principles facilitating our classification scheme rely on two basic assumptions: (I) Different types of ochre modifications leave surface marks with different morphologies and shapes and (II) the morphometrics of different marks can be reliably measured and quantified through the microtopographic profile analysis. Although similar assumptions have been thoroughly tested and found to be correct within the anthropogenic cutmark analysis of bone (Bello & Galway‐Witham, 2019; Bello & Soligo, 2008), up until now, they have not been assessed in the context of surface modifications on ochre.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are few high‐resolution investigations of surface modifications on ochre (but see Rosso et al, 2017), a quantitative cut mark analysis has a long history within faunal taphonomy (Binford, 1981; Lartet & Christy, 1875; Shipman, 1981). Particularly relevant for this study is the development of morphometrical analysis of cutmarks using high‐resolution 3D digital recording methods, including the application of 3D digital microscopes (Bello & Galway‐Witham, 2019; Bello & Soligo, 2008; Bello et al, 2011; Boschin & Crezzini, 2012; Braun et al, 2016; Wallduck & Bello, 2018), 3D laser scanning (Güth, 2012), micro‐CT scanning (Bello et al, 2013) and microphotogrammetry (González et al, 2015). These 2D and 3D recording methods have proven to not only be accurate (Courtenay et al, 2018) but also applicable to a range of different types of surface modifications, other than butchering marks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incisions were further examined using an LEO1455VP and a Quanta 650FEG SEM (FEI Company) scanning electron microscope (SEM), operated in variable pressure mode (chamber pressure respectively 15 Pa and 70 Pa). The high resolution of SEM images allows better characterisation and appreciation of the incised forms by identifying the agent responsible for their production (natural vs humanly induced; the type of tool used; [ 57 ]). In order to identify the elemental composition of possible exogenous material adhering to the stone surface, Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis was conducted using the FlatQuad 5060F detector (Bruker) with the following microscope setup: 10kV, spot 3.0, chamber pressure 30Pa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system was used to produce three-dimensional (3D) micro-morphological models of the incisions according to the methodology described by Bello and co-authors [ 44 , 58 , 59 ]. The 3-dimensional reconstruction of the topography of the engraved surfaces allows a better recognition and interpretation of the technical and gestural procedures followed during engraving [ 9 , 57 , 60 , 61 ]), including the chronological order of the marks [ 28 , 58 , 62 64 ]. The full length of the incision (L) was measured when possible (cf.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key component to these studies has been the development of quantitative methods for cross-section analyses (Bello & Soligo, 2008;Maté-González et al, 2015;Yravedra et al, 2017), as well as the 3D processing of entire trace morphologies Courtenay et al, 2019a). Recent developments in microscopy have also played an important role in these fields of study, with the progression from scanning electron microscopy (Walker & Long, 1977;Potts & Shipman, 1981;Shipman & Rose, 1983;Andrews & Cook, 1985;Behrensmeyer et al, 1986;Olsen & Shipman, 1988), to eventually including highly complex types of equipment using confocal (Bello & Soligo, 2008;Boschin & Crezzini, 2011;Archer & Braun, 2013;Braun et al, 2016;Maté-González et al, 2017;Otárolla-Castillo et al, 2017;Pante et al, 2017;Gümrükçu & Pante, 2018), 3D digital mi-croscopy Courtenay et al, 2019b), as well as combining different techniques for more in-depth studies (Bello & Galway-Witham, 2019). A recent advance in the use of 3D digital microscopy was able to provide a new perspective for trampling mark analysis (Courtenay et al, 2019b), detecting minute variations in the morphology of these superficial traces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%