Bone surrogates provide authentic onlay graft fixation torques

Hollensteiner, Marianne; Augat, Peter; Fürst, David; Schrödl, Falk; Esterer, Benjamin; Gabauer, Stefan; Schrempf, Andreas

doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.12.013

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To fabricate phantoms with different elastic modulus, softener was added and resulted in elastic modulus of 3-200 kPa (Hungr et al 2012). The mechanical and imaging properties of Hollensteiner et al (2017Hollensteiner et al ( , 2018Hollensteiner et al ( , 2019, (g) Tai et al (2015Tai et al ( , 2016Tai et al ( , 2018, (h) Riel et al (2014), Lyu et al (2019).…”

Section: Human Tissuementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The mechanical and imaging properties of Table 8. TMMs for soft tissue used to simulate surgical procedures where (a) Jiang et al (2011), (b) Jiang et al (2013), (c) Li et al (2015a), (d) de Jong et al (2017), (e) Melnyk et al (2019), (f) Forte et al (2016), (g) Leibinger et al (2016), (h) Tan et al (2018), (i) Choi et al (2020), (j) Chen and Shih (2013), (k) Leibinger et al (2016), (l) Hungr et al (2012), (m) Li et al (2015bLi et al ( , 2016 Hollensteiner et al (2017Hollensteiner et al ( , 2018Hollensteiner et al ( , 2019, (g) Tai et al (2015Tai et al ( , 2016Tai et al ( , 2018, (h) Riel et al (2014), Lyu et al (2019).…”

Section: Human Tissuementioning

confidence: 99%

“…This discrepancy may be due to the inherent differences between epoxy and human cortical bone. Hollensteiner et al (2017Hollensteiner et al ( , 2018Hollensteiner et al ( , 2019 proposed another PU foam-based bone analog with the inner cancellous layer made from PU foam filled with water and the outer cortical layer made from PU foam with mineral-based fillers. This bone analog demonstrated similar performance in drilling, milling, sawing, and screw implant compared to the haptic responses of human parietal bone.…”

Section: Tmm For Hard Tissue In Surgical Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Tissue mimicking materials for imaging and therapy phantoms: a review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tissue mimicking materials (TMMs), typically contained within phantoms, have been used for many decades in both imaging and therapeutic applications. This review investigates the specifications that are typically being used in development of the latest TMMs. The imaging modalities that have been investigated focus around CT, mammography, SPECT, PET, MRI and ultrasound. Therapeutic applications discussed within the review include radiotherapy, thermal therapy and surgical applications. A number of modalities were not reviewed including optical spectroscopy, optical imaging and planar x-rays. The emergence of image guided interventions and multimodality imaging have placed an increasing demand on the number of specifications on the latest TMMs. Material specification standards are available in some imaging areas such as ultrasound. It is recommended that this should be replicated for other imaging and therapeutic modalities. Materials used within phantoms have been reviewed for a series of imaging and therapeutic applications with the potential to become a testbed for cross-fertilization of materials across modalities. Deformation, texture, multimodality imaging and perfusion are common themes that are currently under development.

show abstract

Section: Human Tissuementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Human Tissuementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Tmm For Hard Tissue In Surgical Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Tissue mimicking materials for imaging and therapy phantoms: a review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…86 Currently, titanium osteosynthesis and screws are the default choice in orthognathic surgery and maxillofacial traumatology. [88][89][90] Alternatively, resorbable pins can be used. 91 Biodegradable systems reduce the number of necessary surgical interventions, as there is no need to remove them after the initial procedure.…”

Section: Stabilizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bone tissue 3D bioprinting in regenerative dentistry through the perspective of the diamond concept of healing: A narrative review

Osypko¹,

Ciszyński

Kubasiewicz−Ross

et al. 2023

Adv Clin Exp Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three-dimensional bioprinting technology appears to be a promising solution for the treatment and reconstruction of a wide range of maxillofacial bone defects. In this review, the authors discuss different bioprinting solutions and options in the context of the 4 factors of bone healing: structures or scaffolds, osteogenic cells, growth factors, and stabilization (diamond concept of healing), as well as the influence of a 5 th factor -vascularization. Bone is a complex tissue; hence, bone bioprinting may require different technical approaches and mixed methods. Ultraviolet (UV) crosslinkable hydrogels, such as gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), are among the most promising bioinks; they are enhanced by hydroxyapatite or 1-2.5 mm beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) granules and porous scaffolds with recommended pore sizes greater than 300 µm. The advantages of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are their significant availability, low tumorigenicity, and great potential for differentiation into osteoblasts or endothelial cells (ECs). Although growth factors require advanced delivery systems, they provide excellent improvement in the functionality of printed tissues. A proper vasculature system supplies cells with oxygen and nutrients, removes waste products, promotes osteogenesis, prevents ischemic necrosis, and improves the mechanical properties of bone. With all of these aspects perfectly balanced and working in synergy, the clinical use of bioprinting is only a matter of time.

show abstract