2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.02.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone strength and its determinants in pre- and early pubertal boys and girls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

23
118
4
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
23
118
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This unbalanced inclusion of males may have reduced the magnitude and significance of all of Ward's comparisons, as many of their analyses indicated smaller magnitudes for activity effects among males. Furthermore, other studies have reported sexual dimorphism in bone strength and other bone indices among pre-pubertal children (26,27). Nevertheless, considering methodological differences, our results appear to complement and corroborate the pQCT findings of Ward et al…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This unbalanced inclusion of males may have reduced the magnitude and significance of all of Ward's comparisons, as many of their analyses indicated smaller magnitudes for activity effects among males. Furthermore, other studies have reported sexual dimorphism in bone strength and other bone indices among pre-pubertal children (26,27). Nevertheless, considering methodological differences, our results appear to complement and corroborate the pQCT findings of Ward et al…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Multivariable linear regression was used to compare measures of bone quality between overweight and healthy-weight females and males. Similar to previous studies [31,37], we built our regression models in three steps. In Model 1, we compared bone quality of overweight and healthy-weight participants after adjusting for age, ethnicity (Asian or white), and limb length (tibia or ulna).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included ethnicity in our models due to known differences in bone measures, particularly lower BMC in Asian children than in white children [6,36]. As in previous studies [31,32], we included limb length as an estimate of moment arm. In Model 2, we added LM as a surrogate of muscle force to the covariates in Model 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 The cBSI has been used in other studies to estimate the strength of the distal end of long bones. 29,30 Indeed, a human cadaver study showed that at the 4% tibial site, the cBSI is an excellent determinant of failure load, accounting for 85% of variance. 31 For the radius diaphysis (33% site), the variables of interest were ToA (square millimetres), cortical bone area (CoA; square millimetres), cortical bone mineral content (BMC; milligrams per centimetre), cortical vBMD (milligrams per cubic centimetre), and cortical thickness (millimetres).…”
Section: Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the polar stress-strain index (p-SSI; cubic millimetres) was also generated by the pQCT. The p-SSI is used to indicate bone strength against torsional loads in long bone shafts, 17,29,30,32 and the system computed it by using the following formula: 33…”
Section: Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%