Bone scans with one or two new abnormalities in cancer patients with no known metastases: reliability of interpretation of initial correlative radiographs.

Abstract

To determine the reliability of radiographs obtained for correlation with bone scans showing one or two new abnormalities in cancer patients without known metastases, a retrospective study of 306 scans showing such lesions was performed. Overall, 14% of the lesions proved to be malignant. The initial radiographic interpretation was normal for 43% of the new bone scan lesions; 17% of these lesions were metastases. A benign process was identified on radiographs for 38% of the abnormalities; only one (1%) was a metastasis. Twelve percent of new bone scan lesions correlated with radiographic abnormalities considered either suggestive of or consistent with metastasis, of which 24% and 71%, respectively, proved to be metastases. In cancer patients with one or two new bone scan abnormalities, correlative radiographs showing a benign abnormality are reliable. However, if the radiographs are either normal or show findings considered suggestive of or consistent with metastasis, further evaluation or follow-up is warranted.

MRI or Bone Scan or Both for Staging of Prostate Cancer?

“…2 Our study demonstrated that a fair proportion of our patient staging using the current BS/TXR work-up was not true according to the gold standard. Conventional wisdom is often seen as an obstacle to introducing new theories-a cause of inertia.…”

Characteristic Appearance of Facet Osteoarthritis of the Lower Lumbar Spine on Planar Bone Scintigraphy With a High Negative Predictive Value for Metastasis

“…The only strong criteria suggesting metastatic disease to the spine is the presence of multiple new abnormalities; the reported incidence of metastases with only 1 or 2 new bone scan abnormalities ranges from Ͻ10% to 64%. [1][2][3][4] Distinguishing benign from malignant lesions in cancer patients on planar bone scintigraphic images can often be a diagnostic dilemma. This dilemma is often resolved by further correlation of the scan findings with …”

Spine metastasis imaging: review of the literature

“…It is generally agreed that a variation of almost 50% of normal bone tissue mass is necessary for detection [13,17]. Thus, in breast carcinomas, radiographic signs are visible six months later than those seen on scintigraphy [20].…”