Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology

Larsson, Christer; Thomsen, Peter; Lausmaa, Jukka; Rodahl, Michael; Kasemo, Bengt Herbert; Ericson, Lars

doi:10.1016/0142-9612(94)90092-2

Cited by 254 publications

(148 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

134

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…After 6 weeks, the electropolished implants showed decreased bone formation compared with the rougher implants. In an identical study, similar implants were investigated after 7-12 weeks of healing (Larsson et al, 1994 After 7 weeks, the results were similar to the previous study, which indicated higher bone formation to implants with increased surface roughness values (anodized) compared with the smooth implants (electropolished). After 12 weeks, the values for the rough implants were steady and the values for the electropolished implants increased to approximately the same level as that found for the rougher implants.…”

Section: Nanoroughnesssupporting

confidence: 75%

Factors Affecting the Success of Dental Implants

Elias¹

2011

Implant Dentistry - A Rapidly Evolving Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Nanoroughnesssupporting

confidence: 75%

Factors Affecting the Success of Dental Implants

Elias¹

2011

Implant Dentistry - A Rapidly Evolving Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Numerous studies investigated the effects of surface texture or microtopography on interfacial strength and the cellular response, both in vivo and in vitro (see e.g. [2][3][4][5][6][7]). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurements of Surface Roughness in Conventional and Ultrasonically Assisted Bone Drilling

Alam¹,

Mitrofanov²,

Silberschmidt³

2009

Am. J. Biomed. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bone fracture due to an accident, aging or diseases is a feature of everyday life. One of the principal methods of repair and reconstruction of such a fracture is based on drilling the bone and fixing its separate parts together using screws, wires and plates. Morphology of the drilled hole surface and fixative components such as screws, pins and hooks influences strength of the bonds between them. Modern measurement methods provide researchers with a high-precision data on the main parameters of surface roughness. This study is concerned with measurements of surface roughness of holes drilled in a cortical bone using two drilling techniques. Hole's surface roughness produced with conventional drilling (CD) and ultrasonically assisted drilling (UAD) was measured with, and compared for, various contact and non-contact methods. The difference in surface roughness for both drilling techniques was explained based on high-speed filming of the bone drilling processes.

show abstract

“…Larsson et al carried out implantation in rabbit bone, concluding that the surface roughness and the oxide thickness affect the rate of bone adhesion in the early stages of implantation (1-7 weeks) (Larsson et al, 1994;Larsson et al, 1996).…”

Section: Physicochemical Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surface Aspects of Titanium Dental Implants

Turzó¹

2012

Biotechnology - Molecular Studies and Novel Applications for Improved Quality of Human Life

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology

Cited by 254 publications

References 17 publications

Factors Affecting the Success of Dental Implants

Factors Affecting the Success of Dental Implants

Measurements of Surface Roughness in Conventional and Ultrasonically Assisted Bone Drilling

Surface Aspects of Titanium Dental Implants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About