Bone regeneration after alveolar dehiscence due to orthodontic tooth movement – A case report

Balut, Nasib; Hansa, Ismaeel; González, Enrique Carballo; Ferguson, Donald J.

doi:10.25259/apos-75-2019

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, adding extra labial root torque to the lower incisors to prevent proclination may well have caused further dehiscence and recession and was thus not performed. 17 In hindsight, a pretreatment gingival graft may have been indicated. 18 Facial convexity decreased 8°, the upper lip was retruded by 3.2 mm, and the lower lip protruded 2.8 mm.…”

Section: Case Report Diagnosis and Treatment Planmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of a severe Class II malocclusion with pre-existing root resorption - A judicious use of orthodontic appliances

Hansa

2021

S. Afr. dent. j.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The orthodontic treatment of patients with pre-existing root resorption (RR) is often difficult due to the increased risk of progression and often a compromised treatment outcome can be expected. The treatment plan in such situations should comprise of a root sparing strategy, which includes reducing the treatment duration with fixed appliances, non-extraction treatment, reducing force levels, avoiding intrusion of at-risk teeth, reducing the amount of apical movement of the affected teeth and intermittent force application where possible. The following case report shows the use of a root sparing strategy in the treatment of a severe Class II malocclusion with pre-existing root resorption of the 11 and 21.

show abstract

Section: Case Report Diagnosis and Treatment Planmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of a severe Class II malocclusion with pre-existing root resorption - A judicious use of orthodontic appliances

Hansa

2021

S. Afr. dent. j.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the torque movement by lingualization of the tooth showed an increased bone apposition. 19,20 Proclination of the anterior teeth is usually performed in orthodontics to camouflage certain malocclusion characteristics. Proclination movement rarely produces gingival recession, in such a condition that it does not exceed an acceptable limit (no more than 10 degree).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Changes of Periodontal Tissues Because of Orthodontic Treatment: A Retrospective Study

Alzoman

Alamoud

Alomran

et al. 2021

Journal of Advanced Oral Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To evaluate the periodontal status before and after orthodontic treatment and to analyze the confounding factors associated with it. Materials and Methods: The present retrospective study analyzed pre- and posttreatment records of a total of 60 patients. Intraoral digital photographs before and after the orthodontic treatment were used to measure the following three periodontal variables: (a) width of the keratinized gingiva, (b) gingival recession, and (c) the status of interdental papilla. The ImageJ 46 software imaging program was used to perform the required measurements. The clinical data were then analyzed in an association with the participants’ demographic data, the type of orthodontic tooth movement, and other confounding factors. The data obtained were manually entered into the statistical package and analyzed using a significance level set at P < .05. Descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, and Pearson’s correlation analysis were used to identify differences among the studied variables. Results: Among the 60 patients, the majority (66.7%) were females. Most cases of the treated malocclusion were Class II, and most patients underwent intrusion and retrusion movements. The width of keratinized gingiva increased for most sites of upper teeth. In contrast, the lower teeth showed a mix of improvement and compromised width of keratinized gingiva. As a measure of gingival recession, the difference of clinical crown height revealed the tendency toward a reduced clinical crown height for most sites. Upper left lateral incisors and canines showed significant values with regard to keratinized gingival width measurements and tooth movements such as extrusion and intrusion movements. Likewise, with regard to the clinical crown height, upper right central incisors showed significant differences when correlated with the interincisal angle, lower incisors to the mandibular plane, and upper incisors to the NA line. The upper lateral incisors also showed significant correlations to certain cephalometric measurements. Conclusions: The orthodontic treatment was found to exert a significantly positive impact on the surrounding periodontium, particularly in the upper canine areas. Likewise, various types of tooth movement were found to positively affect the periodontium.

show abstract

Bone regeneration after alveolar dehiscence due to orthodontic tooth movement – A case report

Cited by 2 publications

References 10 publications

Treatment of a severe Class II malocclusion with pre-existing root resorption - A judicious use of orthodontic appliances

Treatment of a severe Class II malocclusion with pre-existing root resorption - A judicious use of orthodontic appliances

Changes of Periodontal Tissues Because of Orthodontic Treatment: A Retrospective Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About