2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone morphogenic protein-2 signaling in human disc degeneration and correlation to the Pfirrmann MRI grading system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pfirrmann grading focuses on the morphological assessment of the IVD, whereas the early stages of IVD degeneration may not be reflected in morphological changes. 28 In subjects who develop early IVD degeneration, the Pfirrmann grading system may underestimate the level of IVD degeneration. Moreover, the low sample sizes of patients with grades I and V may have influenced the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pfirrmann grading focuses on the morphological assessment of the IVD, whereas the early stages of IVD degeneration may not be reflected in morphological changes. 28 In subjects who develop early IVD degeneration, the Pfirrmann grading system may underestimate the level of IVD degeneration. Moreover, the low sample sizes of patients with grades I and V may have influenced the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, although 10% of patients with grade IV disease were categorized into the osteoporosis group and 21% of patients with grade II disease were categorized into the healthy group, sufficient statistical evidence to support an association between BMFF and Pfirrmann grade remains lacking. Pfirrmann grading focuses on the morphological assessment of the IVD, whereas the early stages of IVD degeneration may not be reflected in morphological changes 28 . In subjects who develop early IVD degeneration, the Pfirrmann grading system may underestimate the level of IVD degeneration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pfirrmann grade system was used to evaluate the degree of disc degeneration on the T2-weighted MRI ( Figure 1 ). Details of the Pfirrmann grading system can be found in Reference [ 16 ]. Pfirrmann grades I and II were taken as nondegenerative discs, whereas grades III, IV, and V were considered degenerative discs [ 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the Pfirrmann grading system can be found in Reference [ 16 ]. Pfirrmann grades I and II were taken as nondegenerative discs, whereas grades III, IV, and V were considered degenerative discs [ 16 ]. Based on the Pfirrmann grading system, patients were classified into group N (nondegenerative discs in lumbar) and group D (degenerative discs in lumbar).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The causes of cLBP are varied and can be both mechanical and nonmechanical, and can be worsened by risk factors including inactivity, smoking, age, and others. [1][2][3] Biomarkers have been studied extensively in known contributors to cLBP [4][5][6] such as intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration (IDD), 7 modic changes, [8][9][10] and fibromyalgia. 11 The significant association of disparate biomarkers with the causes of cLBP and the response to treatment supports the need for integrative and harmonized "omics" approach that has been developed and implemented by BACPAC.…”
Section: Chronic Low Back Painmentioning
confidence: 99%