“…In addition, one duplicated study (Ferrari et al, 2003) and one study with a problematic BMD at the Ward's triangle (Ferrari et al, 2004) from two articles were further excluded. Therefore, 23 studies with 11,957 subjects from 16 articles were eligible in the BMD analysis (Lorentzon et al, 2000;Ferrari et al, 2001;Ota et al, 2001;Fontova et al, 2002;Garnero et al, 2002;Chung et al, 2003;Ferrari et al, 2003;Yamada et al, 2003;Ferrari et al, 2004;James et al, 2004;Moffett et al, 2004 C, cohort; CS, cross-sectional study; CC, case-control study; CRT, cross-sectional on randomized control trial; FN, femoral neck; LS, lumbar spine; WB, whole body; TH, total hip; TR, trochanter; 1/3R, one-third distal radius; MID, mid-distal radius; UDR, ultradistal radius; WT, Ward's triangle; DR, distal radius; PR, proximal radius; NA, not available; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index. All population-based studies at all skeletal sites analyzed; all studies recruited Asian populations at the lumbar spine and whole body; all Asian studies recruited Japanese populations at the trochanter and Ward's triangle; all studies were classified as high quality at the trochanter and Ward's triangle.…”