2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone mass density, fracture history, self-reported osteoporosis as proxy variables for estrogen and the risk of non-small-cell lung cancer—A population based cohort study, the HUNT study: Are proxy variables friends or faults?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, high bone density disorders from the immune disease class were strongly enriched in lung squamous cell carcinoma (Lung-SCC; Log2OR = 5.39, P = 3.45 × 10 −2 ). Interestingly, the comorbidity relationship between bone mineral density disorder and lung cancer has previously been observed 19, 20 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, high bone density disorders from the immune disease class were strongly enriched in lung squamous cell carcinoma (Lung-SCC; Log2OR = 5.39, P = 3.45 × 10 −2 ). Interestingly, the comorbidity relationship between bone mineral density disorder and lung cancer has previously been observed 19, 20 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The random effects model was performed for the meta-analysis of pooled quantitative data due to statistically significant heterogeneity across the included studies (P < 0.05 or I 2 > 50%). In this pooled analysis of serum CYFRA 21-1 level in all NSCLC patients showed that the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR was 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58, 0.61), 0.90 (95% CI 0.89, 0.91), 5.93 (95% CI 4.10, 8.57), 0.40 (95% CI 0.32, 0.50), and 16.17 (95% CI 10.04, 26.04), respectively, and the area under the SROC curve was 0.8676 (Q*=0.7981) (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All statistical tests were two sided, and P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The heterogeneity test was performed through Cochran’s Q statistics and I 2 test. If there was significant heterogeneity with P < 0.05 or I 2 > 50%, the random effects model was chosen to obtain the combined effect value; otherwise, the fixed effects model was adopted (P ⩾ 0.05 or I 2 ⩽ 50%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations