2006
DOI: 10.1080/10428190600709127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone marrow involvement in follicular lymphoma: Comparison of histology and flow cytometry as staging procedures

Abstract: Bone marrow (BM) examination is a routine staging procedure in follicular lymphoma (FL). Commonly, both BM histology as well as flow cytometry (FCM) of BM aspirates are performed. In order to compare the diagnostic value of these two techniques, we retrospectively evaluated trephine BM biopsies and listmode data of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of FL, obtained in parallel during a 5-year period. One hundred and thirty nine specimens from 91 patients with FL were eligible for analysis. After joint review,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering specific NHL subtypes, in our study FL is the histologic subtype with most discordant cases, largely represented by BMB+/FC− cases. These findings are in a good agreement with previous study (Table 5), and particularly with two recent reports focused specifically on BM involvement in FL (22, 23). Altogether, the data confirm that in FL, histology has a higher sensitivity than FC in detecting BM involvement; this is probably because of the common paratrabecular pattern in FL in which neoplastic cells are frequently tightly bound to bone trabeculae, and to the accompanying reticulin fibrosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering specific NHL subtypes, in our study FL is the histologic subtype with most discordant cases, largely represented by BMB+/FC− cases. These findings are in a good agreement with previous study (Table 5), and particularly with two recent reports focused specifically on BM involvement in FL (22, 23). Altogether, the data confirm that in FL, histology has a higher sensitivity than FC in detecting BM involvement; this is probably because of the common paratrabecular pattern in FL in which neoplastic cells are frequently tightly bound to bone trabeculae, and to the accompanying reticulin fibrosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…A support of this hypothesis is the consideration that the quantitative assessment of infiltrate detected by the two techniques in FL cases showed a striking difference, with a significantly lower extent of infiltration evidenced by FC with respect to morphology, as also reported by Schmidt et al. (23), whereas in other subtypes (SLL, MCL, NMZL and SMZL), we found a quite complete overlap. Another significant finding, despite the relatively low number of cases, was the high rate of discordant results detected in LPL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…True neoplastic follicles are rare, occurring in less than 5% of cases, and can be distinguished from reactive lymphoid follicles by their bcl-2 positivity [36] . Due to the characteristic distribution of the neoplastic infiltrates, immunohistochemistry is of minor importance in cases with an established diagnosis of FL, but occasionally can detect small linear accumulations of neoplastic B cells lining the bony trabecules [10,37] . The neoplastic infiltrates in FL usually contain a high number of reactive T cells, which should not distract from a diagnosis if the typical morphological features are present.…”
Section: Non-hodgkin's Lymphomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, assessment of marrow involvement by histology is not impeded by fibrosis, which is a frequent finding in lymphomatous infiltrates and may lead to false-negative results in BM aspirates due to sampling error [8][9][10] . For these reasons, the performance of a unilateral (or bilateral) BM trephine of adequate size with a minimal length of 2 cm, preferably examined by step sectioning, is regarded mandatory in patients with malignant lymphoma both for the initial determination of BM involvement and response evaluation [11,12] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such biopsies should have at least a length of 1 cm containing minimally 10 representative bone marrow spaces and must be obtained from a bone area that has not been aspirated to avoid aspiration artifacts; usually the trephine needle should be drilled deeper into the iliac crest after aspiration. For lymphoma staging, biopsies of at least 2 cm or performance of bilateral biopsies has been recommended, since the trephine length clearly correlates with detectability of involvement [5][6][7]. One important detail to address is adequate fi xation and decalcifi cation [1,2,4]; these guarantee a good working immunohistological and molecular work-up [3,8], which is mandatory for specifi c questions like exact blast counting in MDS, proof of light chain restriction in plasma cell neoplasms or immunophenotyping and translocation analysis in lymphoma diagnostics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%