2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2017.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone Margin Analysis for Benign Odontogenic Tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oda et al 32 showed a close spatial relationship and/or association between odontomas and the GT on CBCTs, noticeable in exams of individuals less than 20 years of age (>96%). Indeed, benign odontogenic tumors represent a heterogeneous group of lesions developed from the various components of the odontogenic apparatus, 33 which encompass some similarity with RO regarding etiopathogenesis. In addition, the present case emphasizes the importance of CBCT to accurately detect GT, since panoramic radiography usually does not reveal this finding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oda et al 32 showed a close spatial relationship and/or association between odontomas and the GT on CBCTs, noticeable in exams of individuals less than 20 years of age (>96%). Indeed, benign odontogenic tumors represent a heterogeneous group of lesions developed from the various components of the odontogenic apparatus, 33 which encompass some similarity with RO regarding etiopathogenesis. In addition, the present case emphasizes the importance of CBCT to accurately detect GT, since panoramic radiography usually does not reveal this finding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 It is crucial to distinguish between radiographic margins and surgical margins assessed in the histopathological examination, as well as to be aware of their dependence. 45 Both Pogrel and Marx 46 and Carlson and Montes 41 suggest a 1 to 1.5 cm radiographic resection margin in case of mandibular ameloblastomas as the sufficient one. The conclusion of Pogrel was based on the findings of Gumgum and Hosgoren, who revealed that in histological sectioning of resected mandible containing ameloblastoma the tumor cells could be found up to 8 mm from the radiographic and clinical margin of the lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the case of segmental mandibulectomy, the extent of adequate margin has been discussed over the years 36. It is crucial to distinguish between radiographic margins and surgical margins assessed in the histopathological examination, as well as to be aware of their dependence 45. Both Pogrel and Marx46 and Carlson and Montes41 suggest a 1 to 1.5 cm radiographic resection margin in case of mandibular ameloblastomas as the sufficient one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of clinical-surgical factors for recurrence, as well as the histological, cellular, and/or molecular understanding, could help in the construction of better clinical, prognostic, and follow-up decisions [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. The histopathological analysis trying to associate the follicular, plexiform, acanthomatous, or other patterns with their pathogenesis or prognosis is controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%