1979
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(79)90040-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone healing in rabbits after compression osteosynthesis: a comparative study between the radiological and histological findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current findings indicate that plating with a fixation stiffness in bending of (12). This is in accordance with other reports of the healing pattern after rigid plate fixation, which found a direct angiogenic bone formation, most of which was oriented along the line of the osteotomy gap; this occurs without the intervention of cartilage, whether or not compression has been applied (2,3,6,9). In areas with contact between the fragments, bone healing may take place by direct Haversian remodeling of cortex to cortex across the fracture (9,ll).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The current findings indicate that plating with a fixation stiffness in bending of (12). This is in accordance with other reports of the healing pattern after rigid plate fixation, which found a direct angiogenic bone formation, most of which was oriented along the line of the osteotomy gap; this occurs without the intervention of cartilage, whether or not compression has been applied (2,3,6,9). In areas with contact between the fragments, bone healing may take place by direct Haversian remodeling of cortex to cortex across the fracture (9,ll).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This evaluation was graded as: 1 (no pain response on manipulation of limb), 2 (mild-allows manipulation of limb through normal range of motion, but acknowledges pain by turning head or pulling away), 3 (moderate-will not allow manipulation through normal range of motion; acknowledges pain as score 2) and 4 (severe-will not allow manipulation of limb). The healing process was assessed radiologically using the following criteria; loss of sharp fracture edges 10 , loss of fracture line 18 , cortical continuity 10,19 , presence of callus 19,20 , presence or absence of primary and secondary reduction loss 1,5 , delayed union, lack of union 21 , and osteomyelitis 22 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process, which forms the cal lus of the medullary cavity and around the fragments of the fracture, may be considered as preparatory to the real aim of fracture repair, ossification of the fracture gap or bony union [8,9], The amount of peripheral callus varies considerably: it depends on the bone frac tured, the extent of initial displacement, the amount of investing soft tissues, their dam age at the time of injury, the extent of bone necrosis, and the degree of stability or rigid ity after reduction. Mechanical factors, espe cially the degree of movement or rigidity at the fracture site, are important [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%