Abstract:Bone healing is a multifarious process involving mesenchymal stem cells, osteoprogenitor cells, macrophages, osteoblasts and -clasts, and chondrocytes to restore the osseous tissue. Particularly in long bones including the tibia, clavicle, humerus and femur, this process fails in 2–10% of all fractures, with devastating effects for the patient and the healthcare system. Underlying reasons for this failure are manifold, from lack of biomechanical stability to impaired biological host conditions and wound-immane… Show more
“…Smoking is one of the main risk factors for impaired bone healing 23 , but the exact cellular mechanism is not fully known. In this study, we specifically addressed the role of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro, while bone healing at the cellular level in vivo is a complex and lengthy process involving the influx of inflammatory cells in the acute phase, followed by the activation of mesenchymal cells, as reviewed by Marsell and Einhorn 11 , which serve as the effector cells in connective tissue regeneration and healing.…”
INTRODUCTION Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) play a crucial role in promoting tissue regeneration and healing, particularly in bone tissue. Both smoking and nicotine use are known to delay and inhibit the healing process in patients. This study aims at delineating these cellular effects by comparing the impact of nicotine alone to cigarette smoke with equivalent nicotine content, and shedding light on potential differences in the healing process. METHODS We examined how cigarette smoke and nicotine affect the migration, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of human patient-derived MSCs in vitro, as well as the secretion of cytokines IL-6 and IL-8. We measured nicotine concentration of the cigarette smoke extract (CSE) to clarify the role of the nicotine in the effect of the cigarette smoke. RESULTS MSCs exposed to nicotine-concentration-standardized CSE exhibited impaired wound healing capability, and at high concentrations, increased cell death. At lower concentrations, CSE dose-dependently impaired migration, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation, and increased IL-8 secretion. Nicotine impaired proliferation and decreased PINP secretion. While there was a trend for elevated IL-6 levels by nicotine in undifferentiated MSCs, these changes were not statistically significant. Exposure of MSCs to equivalent concentrations of nicotine consistently elicited stronger responses by CSE and had a more pronounced effect on all studied parameters. Our results suggest that the direct effect of cigarette smoke on MSCs contributes to impaired MSC function, that adds to the nicotine effects. CONCLUSIONS Cigarette smoke extract reduced the migration, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation in MSCs in vitro, while nicotine alone reduced proliferation. Cigarette smoke impairs the osteogenic and regenerative ability of MSCs in a direct cytotoxic manner. Cytotoxic effect of nicotine alone impairs regenerative ability of MSCs, but it only partly explains cytotoxic effects of cigarette smoke. Direct effect of cigarette smoke, and partly nicotine, on MSCs could contribute to the smoking-related negative impact on long-term bone health, especially in bone healing.
“…Smoking is one of the main risk factors for impaired bone healing 23 , but the exact cellular mechanism is not fully known. In this study, we specifically addressed the role of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro, while bone healing at the cellular level in vivo is a complex and lengthy process involving the influx of inflammatory cells in the acute phase, followed by the activation of mesenchymal cells, as reviewed by Marsell and Einhorn 11 , which serve as the effector cells in connective tissue regeneration and healing.…”
INTRODUCTION Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) play a crucial role in promoting tissue regeneration and healing, particularly in bone tissue. Both smoking and nicotine use are known to delay and inhibit the healing process in patients. This study aims at delineating these cellular effects by comparing the impact of nicotine alone to cigarette smoke with equivalent nicotine content, and shedding light on potential differences in the healing process. METHODS We examined how cigarette smoke and nicotine affect the migration, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of human patient-derived MSCs in vitro, as well as the secretion of cytokines IL-6 and IL-8. We measured nicotine concentration of the cigarette smoke extract (CSE) to clarify the role of the nicotine in the effect of the cigarette smoke. RESULTS MSCs exposed to nicotine-concentration-standardized CSE exhibited impaired wound healing capability, and at high concentrations, increased cell death. At lower concentrations, CSE dose-dependently impaired migration, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation, and increased IL-8 secretion. Nicotine impaired proliferation and decreased PINP secretion. While there was a trend for elevated IL-6 levels by nicotine in undifferentiated MSCs, these changes were not statistically significant. Exposure of MSCs to equivalent concentrations of nicotine consistently elicited stronger responses by CSE and had a more pronounced effect on all studied parameters. Our results suggest that the direct effect of cigarette smoke on MSCs contributes to impaired MSC function, that adds to the nicotine effects. CONCLUSIONS Cigarette smoke extract reduced the migration, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation in MSCs in vitro, while nicotine alone reduced proliferation. Cigarette smoke impairs the osteogenic and regenerative ability of MSCs in a direct cytotoxic manner. Cytotoxic effect of nicotine alone impairs regenerative ability of MSCs, but it only partly explains cytotoxic effects of cigarette smoke. Direct effect of cigarette smoke, and partly nicotine, on MSCs could contribute to the smoking-related negative impact on long-term bone health, especially in bone healing.
“…These factors are critical for creating an ideal scaffold ( Bian et al, 2013 ). The EO pathway is responsible for the majority of bone growth, as it triggers undifferentiated stem cells to differentiate into functional osteocytes through external factors like a mineralized platform, akin to the IMO pathway ( Saul et al, 2023 ). Researchers are interested in stimulating EO for bone regeneration.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Bone Regenerationmentioning
The repair of bone defects resulting from high-energy trauma, infection, or pathological fracture remains a challenge in the field of medicine. The development of biomaterials involved in the metabolic regulation provides a promising solution to this problem and has emerged as a prominent research area in regenerative engineering. While recent research on cell metabolism has advanced our knowledge of metabolic regulation in bone regeneration, the extent to which materials affect intracellular metabolic remains unclear. This review provides a detailed discussion of the mechanisms of bone regeneration, an overview of metabolic regulation in bone regeneration in osteoblasts and biomaterials involved in the metabolic regulation for bone regeneration. Furthermore, it introduces how materials, such as promoting favorable physicochemical characteristics (e.g., bioactivity, appropriate porosity, and superior mechanical properties), incorporating external stimuli (e.g., photothermal, electrical, and magnetic stimulation), and delivering metabolic regulators (e.g., metal ions, bioactive molecules like drugs and peptides, and regulatory metabolites such as alpha ketoglutarate), can affect cell metabolism and lead to changes of cell state. Considering the growing interests in cell metabolic regulation, advanced materials have the potential to help a larger population in overcoming bone defects.
“…In considering trauma‐induced fractures, it is estimated that up to 10% of all fractures fail to heal within 6 months, a condition known as non‐union, causing severe secondary functional deficits in patients. [ 7 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In considering trauma-induced fractures, it is estimated that up to 10% of all fractures fail to heal within 6 months, a condition known as non-union, causing severe secondary functional deficits in patients. [7] To support bone regeneration, a large number of procedures and bone substitutes were investigated over the years. [8] Nevertheless, autograft transplantation remains the golden standard since it supports osteoinduction, osteoconduction, and osteogenesis.…”
Human decellularized bone fragments are commonly used in clinics to perform allograft surgeries. To reduce the immunological response in the recipient and ensure their safety, these fragments underwent decellularization, a procedure that greatly reduces their osteogenicity (the ability to induce differentiation into osteoblast). In this work, by the introduction of an ultrasonication step to fragment the human bone, the size distribution of the resulting demineralize bone particles can be controlled, tuning their osteogenic potential. The sonication protocol is optimized by a response surface method, using 12 different sonication protocols, allowing to model the relationship between the sonication parameters and the outcoming particles properties in terms of dimensions, physical/chemical properties, and biological activity. The size distribution is extrapolated by a deep learning image segmentation while the structure is characterized by infrared and thermal analysis. The particles are combined with methacrylated silk gel to test in vitro their biological response on adipose‐derived stromal cells. The ultrasonication fragmented the bone particles, revealing their internal organic matrix as proved by secondary electron microscopy and confocal microscopy. An inverse linear correlation is found between the particles’ sizes and their osteogenic activity, thus proving the efficacy of the proposed ultrasonication treatment in tuning the biological response.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.