2018
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone Graft and Substitutes Associated with Titanium Dome for Vertical Bone Formation in Osseointegrated Implants: Histomorphometric Analysis in Dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of this, the application of the guided bone regeneration techniques associated with the use of bone grafts in patients with inadequate bone volume for the installation of implants has been widely encouraged (2). Among the types of bone substitutes, the autografts have been considered the standard due to the biological superiority of this type of bone graft (2,3). However, the risk of morbidity at the donor site and the limitation of quantity disponible presented in some cases led to the use of alternative bone substitutes for this purpose (4,5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, the application of the guided bone regeneration techniques associated with the use of bone grafts in patients with inadequate bone volume for the installation of implants has been widely encouraged (2). Among the types of bone substitutes, the autografts have been considered the standard due to the biological superiority of this type of bone graft (2,3). However, the risk of morbidity at the donor site and the limitation of quantity disponible presented in some cases led to the use of alternative bone substitutes for this purpose (4,5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These biomaterials have shown to be effective in increasing bone availability associated with maxillary sinus floor augmentation 4 , in alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction 6 and in lateral ridge augmentation 7 . However, in spite of these benefits, the use of strictly osteoconductive biomaterials has shown to reduce the formation of bone tissue in comparison to areas grafted with autogenous bone 8 , to reduce bone formation in noncritical size defects compared to those that were filled with clots 9 and to have worse implant osseointegration compared to implants placed in native bone 10 .…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%