1992
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820260705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone formation processin porous calcium carbonate and hydroxyapatite

Abstract: This study determined the bone formation in porous calcium carbonate (CC) and porous hydroxyapatite (HA) in ectopic sites. The bone formation stimulus was derived from bone marrow cells. CC and HA in the shape of disks were implanted with or without rat marrow cells into subcutaneous sites of syngeneic rats. The CC and HA had identical microstructure: pore size was 190-230 microns, porosity was 50-60% and they were fully interconnected. Bone did not form in any implants without marrow cells (disks themselves),… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
106
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
106
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The bone formation of both calcium carbonate and hydroxyapatite occurred initially on surface of the pore regions and progressed toward the center of the pore and was linked to graft resoption. 20 At present there are two commercially available corals: the Biocoral ® composed of corals on their natural form and Pro Osteon™ composed of coralline material converted to hydroxyapatite.…”
Section: Corals As Graft Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bone formation of both calcium carbonate and hydroxyapatite occurred initially on surface of the pore regions and progressed toward the center of the pore and was linked to graft resoption. 20 At present there are two commercially available corals: the Biocoral ® composed of corals on their natural form and Pro Osteon™ composed of coralline material converted to hydroxyapatite.…”
Section: Corals As Graft Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO3Ap block thus prepared was resorbed with osteoclasts and replaced with bone, whereas HAp block was not resorbed with osteoclasts and thus would not be replaced with bone [10][11][12][13] . For the structure of cancellous bone, it is clear that the key advantage of cancellous bone lies in a threedimensional fully interconnected porous structure [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] . An interconnected structure promotes rapid cell and tissue penetration and revascularization, and provides a greater surface area than cortical bone 21) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since HA is relatively simple to synthesise using both wet chemical and reactive sintering routes, it has been widely investigated for use as a bone graft replacement [1,2,3]. The osteoconductive nature of the HA also means that it has found significant use as coating on metallic implants, where it can facilitate the attachment of both hard and soft tissues and allow firm attachment of the prosthesis in vivo [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%