2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone density measurement in interdental areas with simulated placement of orthodontic miniscrew implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
36
2
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
36
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), used for the evaluation of dentomaxillofacial structures, has allowed for more frequent use of these images in dentistry because it is a less complex device that produces images with satisfactory resolution, with little artifact incidence and lower dose of radiation [4] . Multislice and cone beam CT images are frequently used to determine mineral density of craniofacial bone structures [5][6][7][8][9][10] . Yet, there is no consensus regarding the accuracy of CBCT for this type of analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), used for the evaluation of dentomaxillofacial structures, has allowed for more frequent use of these images in dentistry because it is a less complex device that produces images with satisfactory resolution, with little artifact incidence and lower dose of radiation [4] . Multislice and cone beam CT images are frequently used to determine mineral density of craniofacial bone structures [5][6][7][8][9][10] . Yet, there is no consensus regarding the accuracy of CBCT for this type of analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Insertion torque has been shown to vary among different designs of mini-implants in varying bone densities. 20 Because bone differs in density in the maxilla and mandible, 21 torque tests were performed on varying cortical bone densities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La clasificación de densidad de tejidos en escala HU es complementada por Misch, quien relacionó las densidades óseas D1, D2, D3 y D4, con las escalas HU [1], comparando las imágenes tomográficas de los tejidos analizados y clasificados en el software con sus valores de grises cuantificados a escala Hounsfield [20]. La relación establecida por Misch, quedó definida de la siguiente forma: El tejido óseo más denso tipo D1, es asociado con escalas superiores a 1250 HU, con respecto valores de HU en escala de grises con alto porcentaje de blanco; por su parte, el hueso Tipo D2 es reconocido con valores entre 850-1250 HU; en contraste con los tejidos más densos, los huesos de menor densidad ósea en las imágenes tomográficas presentan valores de grises con alto porcentaje de negro, el Hueso Tipo D3 se relaciona con valores de HU entre 350-850 y el Hueso Tipo D4 con valores 150-350 HU [25].…”
Section: Tejido óSeounclassified