2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14143892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone Conduction Capacity of Highly Porous 3D-Printed Titanium Scaffolds Based on Different Pore Designs

Abstract: In porous titanium scaffolds manufactured via 3D printing, the differences in bone formation according to pore design and implantation period were studied. Titanium scaffolds with three types of different pore structures (Octadense, Gyroid, and Dode) were fabricated via 3D printing using the selective laser melting method. Mechanical properties of scaffolds were investigated. Prepared specimens were inserted into both femurs of nine rabbits and their clinical characteristics were observed. Three animals were s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of the bone inward growth of several lattice shapes was compared, and the results showed that the bone growth degree of the gyro, conical, and cubic lattices was the best. Lim et al [64] also came to the same conclusion by implanting titanium scaffolds of three different structures (octadense, gyroid, and dode) into the femur of rabbits, and no differences in bone formation in the titanium scaffolds were observed between the three types of pore structures. Farazin et al [65] compared the biocompatibility of the cube, pyramid, and diagonal pore structures and found that the pyramid structures had the highest cell viability and migration ability.…”
Section: Pore Configurationmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The efficiency of the bone inward growth of several lattice shapes was compared, and the results showed that the bone growth degree of the gyro, conical, and cubic lattices was the best. Lim et al [64] also came to the same conclusion by implanting titanium scaffolds of three different structures (octadense, gyroid, and dode) into the femur of rabbits, and no differences in bone formation in the titanium scaffolds were observed between the three types of pore structures. Farazin et al [65] compared the biocompatibility of the cube, pyramid, and diagonal pore structures and found that the pyramid structures had the highest cell viability and migration ability.…”
Section: Pore Configurationmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…We investigated the following shapes in our animal experiments: gyroid, cube, cylinder, tetrahedron, double pyramid, and Voronoi ( Figure 1 ). Some of these shapes were chosen for comparison with those examined by several authors [ 6 , 8 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. The degree of bone growth was determined using rivet-like cylindrical implants with a diameter of 6 mm and a rounded shape; these were used in the animal experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the cylindrical shape was associated with increased expression of osteogenic markers at earlier time points, whereas the cubic pore shape proved superior at later ones [ 196 ]. Several in vivo studies assessing various pore geometries have found relatively similar degrees of bone formation within defects, though Kolan et al reported more fibrous tissue formation with their diamond shaped BG scaffold [ 197 , 198 ].…”
Section: Future Directions For Addressing Bone Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%