2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone cement augmentation of femoral nail head elements increases their cut-out resistance in poor bone quality– A biomechanical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As this study is to evaluate by the Harris Hip Function, the results show two groups of patients with postoperative hip joint function improved, though six months after hip function had no significant difference in both the groups, but the study group 1 month after the surgery of the hip joint function was significantly better than control group, analyzes reasons for this recognition on the above as soon as possible after the activity and the benefits of exercise are fully understood. Therefore, in the short term after surgery, patients can actively cooperate with rehabilitation exercise, so that patients can improve the function of hip joint earlier [ 14 17 ]. In addition two kinds of treatment not only can improve the elderly patients with femoral fractures between rotor hip function, also can effectively improve the quality of life, and the team 1 months and 6 months after surgery improved quality of life of significantly higher, illustrate the team earlier recovery of hip function in patients with better blend in social activities, the ability to live independently, Therefore, the quality of life is higher [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this study is to evaluate by the Harris Hip Function, the results show two groups of patients with postoperative hip joint function improved, though six months after hip function had no significant difference in both the groups, but the study group 1 month after the surgery of the hip joint function was significantly better than control group, analyzes reasons for this recognition on the above as soon as possible after the activity and the benefits of exercise are fully understood. Therefore, in the short term after surgery, patients can actively cooperate with rehabilitation exercise, so that patients can improve the function of hip joint earlier [ 14 17 ]. In addition two kinds of treatment not only can improve the elderly patients with femoral fractures between rotor hip function, also can effectively improve the quality of life, and the team 1 months and 6 months after surgery improved quality of life of significantly higher, illustrate the team earlier recovery of hip function in patients with better blend in social activities, the ability to live independently, Therefore, the quality of life is higher [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cement augmentation for primary fixation of osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures has been studied and shows favorable biomechanical and clinical results. 20,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57] A recent review reported that cement augmentation lead to higher loads to failure, decreased implant migration, and decreased complications and reoperations compared to non-augmented fixation. 20 A randomized multicenter prospective study also reported no reoperations or symptomatic episodes of CMN migration in a cement-augmented group vs 6 cases in the nonaugmented group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical testing was performed on a servo-hydraulic test system (Mini Bionix II 858, MTS Systems Corp., Eden Prairie, MN, USA) equipped with a 25 kN load cell. An adopted test setup from previous work was used to test each specimen by simulating an unstable pertrochanteric fracture with a lack of posteromedial support and load sharing at the fracture gap ( Figure 3 ) [ 4 , 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…unstable pertrochanteric fracture with a lack of posteromedial support and load sharing at the fracture gap (Figure 3) [4,19,20].…”
Section: Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation