1962
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3697(62)90001-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bonds broken at atomically flat crystal surfaces—I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore only the faces in the (110) zones between {111} and {110}, which can be denoted by {hhk}h> k, are stepped, while {111} are the only F-faces of the diamond crystal. Neglecting entropy effects, the surface free energy can be assumed to be proportional with the density of dangling bonds at a crystal surface [14][15][16]. Furthermore, considering the crystal surface merely as a simple truncation of the bulk crystal, a first order approximation for the surface free energy as a function of the crystallographic orientation can be derived.…”
Section: Theory Of Surface Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore only the faces in the (110) zones between {111} and {110}, which can be denoted by {hhk}h> k, are stepped, while {111} are the only F-faces of the diamond crystal. Neglecting entropy effects, the surface free energy can be assumed to be proportional with the density of dangling bonds at a crystal surface [14][15][16]. Furthermore, considering the crystal surface merely as a simple truncation of the bulk crystal, a first order approximation for the surface free energy as a function of the crystallographic orientation can be derived.…”
Section: Theory Of Surface Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 refers to the dbb value (left-hand y axis), estimated in the manner outlined in ref. 32. As described earlier [23,33], in order to examine the correlation between Er.…”
Section: Comparison With Capacitance-potential Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the specific surface free energy (the surface free energy per unit area) is generally different for different crystallographic orientations. To first approximation this can be understood from the broken bond model that was introduced by Mackenzie [Mac62], but is still used today [Liu09]: the surface energy of a crystallographic orientation can be found by calculating the energy involved in breaking the bonds (between nearest-neighbors, between second-nearest neighbors, and so on) upon cleavage. The surface energy, or surface tension, is difficult to determine, and in the literature there exists a considerable scatter in data, both from calculations [e.g.…”
Section: Equilibrium Crystal Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%