“…Note that one of the reasons for investigating these Cu–CO and Ag–CO complexes 11 , 13 – 15 is to probe the scorpionate ligand effects on the metal site using the CO stretch, and to compare the new poly(pyridyl)borate and better-known poly(pyrazolyl)borate systems. Computational analysis , of molecules such as [Ph 2 B(3-(CF 3 )Pz) 2 ]Cu(CO), [Ph 2 B(3-(CH 3 )Pz) 2 ]Cu(CO), [HB(3,5-(CF 3 ) 2 Pz) 3 ]Ag(CO), and [MeB(3-(Mes)Pz) 3 ]Ag(CO) indicate that the LM and CO (L = scorpionate) is mainly electrostatic. Traditional σ-donor/π-acceptor interactions usually explained by the Dewar–Chatt–Duncanson model are also significant. , Overall, the strength of the electrostatic attraction and the degree of π-backbonding between LM and CO fragments correlate well with the observed υ̅(CO), which gets higher with more weakly donating ligand support on a metal.…”