Bonding properties of universal adhesives to root canals prepared with different rotary instruments

Bakaus, Thaís Emanuelle; Gruber, Yançanã Luizy; Reis, Alessandra; Gomes, João Carlos; Gomes, Giovana Mongruel

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.013

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Un l i ke most st ud ies t h at eva luated t he failure pattern after the push-out test, this study demonstrated the predominance of mixed and non-adhesive fracture patterns. 31,32 Another recent study on self-adhesive cements corroborated the fracture pattern found in the present study. 33 Mixed fractures are interesting and promising in terms of bond strength, since they represent better interaction of the cement with the dentin, preventing the cement from being removed from the substrate as easily as in adhesive fractures.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Effect of the application of different concentrations of EDTA on the adhesion of fiber posts using self-adhesive cements

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Effect of the application of different concentrations of EDTA on the adhesion of fiber posts using self-adhesive cements

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For primary teeth, the ER strategy resulted in better dentinal bond strengths with UAs . Studies evaluating UA‐root dentin bond strengths have presented conflicting evidence with some advocating the use of SE strategy while others recommending the ER strategy for luting fiber‐reinforced composite posts.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increasing demand for simplified and user-friendly adhesive systems has led to the development of a new class of adhesives termed as Universal Adhesives (UAs). The term "Universal" reflects manufacturers' claims that these adhesives can be applied with any adhesion strategy and offer the versatility of use with a variety of direct and indirect restorative materials. The aim of this review was to synthesize the literature regarding the current status of UAs, their adhesion potential to various substrates and their performance in different restorative situations. In vitro studies, clinical trials and systematic reviews were identified utilizing controlled vocabulary and keyword searches in Medline and EMBASE databases. About 282 studies (272 in vitro studies; 11 clinical studies) were included. Available laboratory and clinical evidence does not support the claim that UAs can be used with any adhesive strategy. Although, they can chemically bond to various tooth and direct/indirect restorative substrates, the stability of this bond is material-dependent and subject to hydrolytic degradation. Hence, additional measures are still needed to ensure long-term durability. which undermines the versatility of UAs. The lack of long-term data regarding the clinical performance of UAs further complicates clinical decision-making.

show abstract

“…A self-etch universal adhesive was used in this study. The literature shows that universal adhesives should be used in self-etch mode to improve the adhesion of GFP to the root canal ( Bakaus et al, 2019 , Gruber et al, 2017 , Ubaldini et al, 2018 ). In addition, copolymerization between adhesive and cement is possible, which may explain the similar performance between the root thirds ( Gruber et al, 2017 , Ubaldini et al, 2018 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Push-out bond strength and failure mode of single adjustable and customized glass fiber posts

Lopes

Pedrosa

Oliveira

et al. 2021

The Saudi Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To evaluate the push-out bond strength (PBS) and failure mode of single adjustable (SAP) and customized (CP) posts cemented to root canal dentin using conventional (RelyX Ultimate) or self-adhesive (RelyX U200) dual-cure resin cements. Methods Herein, 40 bovine mandibular incisors were divided into four groups (n = 10): SAP cemented with RelyX Ultimate (SAP-UT), SAP cemented with RelyX U200 (SAP-U2), CP cemented with RelyX Ultimate (CP-UT), and CP cemented with RelyX U200 (CP-U2). PBS and failure modes were analyzed. Three-way repeated measures ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s test and Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact test were used for data analysis (α = 5%). Results The PBS values for SAP (p < .05) were higher than those for CP and were not influenced by the root third and resin cement (p > .05). When conventional resin cement was used, the SAP showed significant differences compared to CP (p < .05). When cemented with RelyX Ultimate, a higher prevalence of mixed and adhesive failures for SAP and CP, respectively, was observed (p < .05). For the self-adhesive resin cement, the failures were mostly adhesive (p < .05). Conclusion SAP showed better performance than CP. The root third and resin cements did not influence the PBS. The most prevalent failures were adhesive and mixed.

show abstract

Bonding properties of universal adhesives to root canals prepared with different rotary instruments

Cited by 8 publications

References 28 publications

Effect of the application of different concentrations of EDTA on the adhesion of fiber posts using self-adhesive cements

Effect of the application of different concentrations of EDTA on the adhesion of fiber posts using self-adhesive cements

Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance

Push-out bond strength and failure mode of single adjustable and customized glass fiber posts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About