2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp03259j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bonding in the helium dimer in strong magnetic fields: the role of spin and angular momentum

Abstract: We investigate the helium dimer in strong magnetic fields, focusing on the spectrum of low-lying electronic states and their dissociation curves, at the full configuration-interaction level of theory. To address...

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps the most well-known example is that of perpendicular paramagnetic bonding in H 2 induced by a strong magnetic field applied perpendicular to the internuclear axis . A more general analysis of these phenomena has recently been presented by Austad et al in ref .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the most well-known example is that of perpendicular paramagnetic bonding in H 2 induced by a strong magnetic field applied perpendicular to the internuclear axis . A more general analysis of these phenomena has recently been presented by Austad et al in ref .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For magnetic fields aligned perpendicular to the internuclear axis, the symmetry is reduced to C 2 h , having a C 2 axis perpendicular to bond axis and along the field direction, a σ h in the plane perpendicular to the axis containing the two nuclei and a center of inversion i . For all other orientations of the magnetic field, the symmetry is reduced to C i , with only the center of inversion preserved. , The molecular orbitals then belong to the irreducible representations of these point groups, rather than those of the D ∞ h point group. In Table , the molecular orbital labels are given for N 2 in each of these point groups in order of the zero-field ground state configuration predicted at the cTPSSrsh/6-311++G** level, as discussed in Section , for the first 26 orbitals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in the presence of a minimum at B ⊥ ≈ 0.1 B 0 . The effect of a perpendicular magnetic field on these states has been already discussed by Hampe and Stopkowicz, and the reader should refer to refs , , and for a deeper analysis. In our comparison, the MOM correctly represents the energy changes with respect to the magnetic field strength, and it may be seen that the crossings of the 1 A g state with the 3 B u and 3 A u states are qualitatively well represented.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%