2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.114.165502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bonding Effects on the Slip Differences in theB1Monocarbides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanical strength of conventionally synthesized TaC is due to (111) slip planes along stacking faults in the crystallites. 16,17 The formation energy of stacking faults in face-centered cubic lattices can increase dramatically with pressure 64 and this, together with the small grain size, suggests that TaC synthesized through the HPHT route has a much lower defect density. In fact, if the defect density decreases sufficiently that their average separation becomes comparable to the grain size, it is possible that other failure mechanisms become more relevant, at higher strength compared to conventionally synthesised TaC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mechanical strength of conventionally synthesized TaC is due to (111) slip planes along stacking faults in the crystallites. 16,17 The formation energy of stacking faults in face-centered cubic lattices can increase dramatically with pressure 64 and this, together with the small grain size, suggests that TaC synthesized through the HPHT route has a much lower defect density. In fact, if the defect density decreases sufficiently that their average separation becomes comparable to the grain size, it is possible that other failure mechanisms become more relevant, at higher strength compared to conventionally synthesised TaC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,14,15 The dominant mechanism responsible for the material strength was identified as a slip along the (111) planes due to inherent stacking faults in TaC. 16,17 Recent reports studied the effects of Al and Si 3 N 4 as sintering aids on the formation of TaC ceramics, 18 which effectively increase the density and strength of sintered materials. With the advancement of experimental technology, higher quality stoichiometric TaC samples have been obtained under high temperature and pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally considered that the group IV carbides slip on {011} planes, while the group V carbides slip on {111}. [96][97][98][99][100][101][102] This therefore raised the interesting question of what is the dominant slip system of (Zr,Hf,Nb,Ta)C. In recent work by Csanadi et al 70 they found from analysis of slip traces in micropillar compression experiments (effectively single crystal) that the dominant slip system for the monocarbides of Ta and Hf, and (Zr,Hf,Nb,Ta)C, was {110} h1…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HfC, a group IVB cubic carbide, exhibits preferential slip on the {110} planes, while TaC, a group VB cubic carbide, exhibits slip on {111} planes at low temperatures . This difference is associated with an intrinsic stable stacking fault in TaC that is absent in HfC, which is created by the extra d ‐shell electron bonding differences between the TMCs. Even though the structures are equivalent, these types of subtle differences in bonding characteristics have a profound impact on the low‐temperature deformation mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%