2005
DOI: 10.1021/om050799t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bonding and Substituent Effects in Electron-Rich Mononuclear Ruthenium σ-Arylacetylides of the Formula [(η2-dppe)(η5-C5Me5)Ru(C⋮C)-1,4-(C6H4)X][PF6]n(n= 0, 1; X = NO2, CN, F, H, OMe, NH2)

Abstract: This study reports the isolation and the structural (X-ray), UV-vis, and NMR characterization of a series of electron-rich Ru(II) acetylide complexes of the formula (η 2 -dppe)(η 5 -C 5 Me 5 )Ru(CtC)-1,4-(C 6 H 4 )X (1a-f; X ) NO 2 , CN, F, H, OMe, NH 2 ) and (η 2 -dppe)(η 5 -C 5 Me 5 )Ru(CtC)-1,3-(C 6 H 4 )F (1c-m), as well as the spectroscopic (near-IR and ESR) in situ characterization of the corresponding elusive Ru(III) radical cations. The spectroscopic data are discussed in connection with DFT computatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

38
161
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
38
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[17a, 18] We have previously established that the electron-releasing power of the "A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (h 2 -dppe) 2 RuCl" group was slightly larger than that of a methoxy group. [8] Based on the anisotropy (Table 4) bility of the "trans-(h 2 -dppe) 2 RuC CPh" fragment compares with that of the "trans-(h 2 -dppe) 2 RuCl" and "trans-(h 2 -dppe) 2 RuCC(4-C 6 H 4 NO 2 )" fragments, which fall, as expected, between those observed for mononuclear Fe III -arylacetylide complexes featuring methoxy (6-OMeA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G [PF 6 ]) and amino (6-NH 2 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G [PF 6 ]) substituents (Scheme 6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17a, 18] We have previously established that the electron-releasing power of the "A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (h 2 -dppe) 2 RuCl" group was slightly larger than that of a methoxy group. [8] Based on the anisotropy (Table 4) bility of the "trans-(h 2 -dppe) 2 RuC CPh" fragment compares with that of the "trans-(h 2 -dppe) 2 RuCl" and "trans-(h 2 -dppe) 2 RuCC(4-C 6 H 4 NO 2 )" fragments, which fall, as expected, between those observed for mononuclear Fe III -arylacetylide complexes featuring methoxy (6-OMeA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G [PF 6 ]) and amino (6-NH 2 A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G [PF 6 ]) substituents (Scheme 6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.251 Å, P-Ru-P 83.21(2), P-Ru-C(1) 78.90, 89.79(7)º]. 36 The Ru-C(1) not characterized, but treated with NEt 3 in situ to ultimately give 2, likely through deprotonation of the vinylidene and reaction with a second molecule of 1, followed by loss of HCl and CO. Attempts to synthesise ({Cp(dppe)Ru}C≡C) 2 CO by an analogous route from Ru(C≡CH)(dppe)Cp and oxalyl dichloride afforded only [Ru(=C=CH 2 )(dppe)Cp] + , identified from its 1 H and 31 P NMR spectra, after workup.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[81]. In each case (3, 5) the metal centre is in a pseudooctahedral geometry, with the P(1)-Ru-P(2) bond angle ca.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrochemical response of ruthenium(II) acetylide complexes of general form Ru(CCAr)(PP)Cp' (Ar = aromatic substituent, PP = phosphine donors, Cp' = Cp, Cp*) is characterised by an oxidation event that has considerable ethynyl ligand character, and as such the potentials of these redox processes, and the chemical stability of the resulting radical cations, is sensitive to the nature of the aromatic group and the electronic properties of substituents [40,81]. However, the different combinations of solvent, supporting electrolyte, temperature and reference electrode employed in collecting the range of available data can make direct comparisons of the results collated from many different research groups difficult, especially in the absence of a reported potential for an internal reference compound [105].…”
Section: Electrochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%