2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2018.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bonding and structural features of metal-metal bonded homo- and hetero-dinuclear complexes supported by unsaturated hydrocarbon ligands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] For instance, as two working hands compared to one single hand, dimetallic systems offer major opportunities to build and stabilize uncommon hydrocarbyl ligands via multisite bridging coordination. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Alkynes are useful and versatile reagents in this setting, and in particular the {M 2 Cp 2 (CO) x } scaffold (M = Fe, Ru; Cp = η 5 -C 5 H 5 ; x = 2, 3) is suitable to promote their coupling with a diversity of bridging coordinated carbon ligands, including carbonyl, 11,12 isocyanide, 13 thiocarbonyl, 14 alkylidyne 10,15,16 and alkylidene ligands, [17][18][19][20] usually via alkyne insertion into the metal-μ-carbon bond, but alternative modes are also possible. 21 The two metal coordination spheres are coordinatively and electronically saturated, therefore prior removal of one 2-electron ligand (usually, a carbon monoxide ligand) is needed to guarantee the initial η 2 -coordination of the alkyne to one metal centre, that is a preliminary, fundamental step along the coupling process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] For instance, as two working hands compared to one single hand, dimetallic systems offer major opportunities to build and stabilize uncommon hydrocarbyl ligands via multisite bridging coordination. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Alkynes are useful and versatile reagents in this setting, and in particular the {M 2 Cp 2 (CO) x } scaffold (M = Fe, Ru; Cp = η 5 -C 5 H 5 ; x = 2, 3) is suitable to promote their coupling with a diversity of bridging coordinated carbon ligands, including carbonyl, 11,12 isocyanide, 13 thiocarbonyl, 14 alkylidyne 10,15,16 and alkylidene ligands, [17][18][19][20] usually via alkyne insertion into the metal-μ-carbon bond, but alternative modes are also possible. 21 The two metal coordination spheres are coordinatively and electronically saturated, therefore prior removal of one 2-electron ligand (usually, a carbon monoxide ligand) is needed to guarantee the initial η 2 -coordination of the alkyne to one metal centre, that is a preliminary, fundamental step along the coupling process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal–metal bonding interactions have attracted considerable attention due to their unique electronic structures and their applications in catalysis. Examples of M–M bonded complexes are known from across the transition series, and the development of ligand scaffolds that are designed to support multinuclear complexes has greatly expanded the variety of clusters that contain M–M bonds. ,− Detailed investigations into how these complexes store electrons in weakly interacting d-manifolds have allowed for an advanced understanding of the nature of bonding, ,,, and in more applied research, M–M bonded systems have been exploited for unique catalytic applications. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,8–10 However, sandwich compounds consisting of a ruthenabenzene acting as a η 6 organometallic ligand towards a second metal centre are significantly rarer and have been prepared mainly via ring closure reaction of open pentadienyl ligands with a suitable metal fragment (Scheme 1a). 11 In principle, dinuclear complexes should be convenient platforms to build metal-coordinated metallabenzenes; 12 in fact, unsaturated hydrocarbyl ligands, when bridging coordinated, may exhibit a peculiar reactivity provided by cooperative effects typical of a bimetallic system, thus facilitating coupling reactions with small molecular fragments otherwise not viable on related monometallic species. 13 To the best of our knowledge, only a few ruthenabenzenes coordinated to a second ruthenium centre have been prepared to date starting from a poly-ruthenium framework, 14 nevertheless the reported synthetic procedures suffer from poor selectivity and a narrow scope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%