Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to different treated indirect composites

Abstract

Surface treatment of indirect resin composite with silane or silane followed by a bonding agent did not affect bond strength to dentin.

Resin Bond to Indirect Composite and New Ceramic/Polymer Materials: A Review of the Literature

“…Furthermore, successful adhesive bonding can increase fracture resistance of the restored tooth and the indirect restoration . It is still a challenge to bond indirect composite restorations to dental hard tissues, as different interfaces—the one between dentin/enamel and adhesive cement, and the interface between luting agent and indirect restoration—have to be considered …”

Effects of calcium hydroxide reagent on the bond strength of resin cements to root dentin and the retention force of FRC posts

“…Evaluation methods for bond strength of dental materials in dentistry usually include the micro-tensile and shear bond strength test 8,[21][22][23][24][25][26] . Root dentin has lower potential for bonding with less exposure of dentinal tubules compared to coronal dentin 27) ; reagents used during root canal treatment can affect bond strength even more 13,22) .…”

“…A number of studies have been undertaken to compare the bond strength of various resin cements to dentin 8,21,[23][24][25][26]28) . Most of these studies reported that adhesive resin cements, that require pretreatment, have higher bond strength compared to self-adhesive resin cements 23,24,26) . These results are consistent with our study where adhesive resin cements, ULR and PAF, which require pretreatment demonstrated greater bond strength.…”

Influence of surface energy parameters of dental self-adhesive resin cements on bond strength to dentin

“…Walter et al [12] found that RelyX TM Unicem showed higher microtensile bond strengths to bovine dentin than Panavia TM F and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (FujiCEM TM , GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan). On the other hand, Viotti et al [7] demonstrated that although the microtensile bond strengths of SRCs to human dentin varied greatly among materials, most of them were significantly lower than the etchand-rinse resin cement (RelyX TM ARC, 3 M ESPE) and Panavia TM F. Fuentes et al [10] also reported lower bonding efficacy of three commercial SRCs to human dentin in comparison with RelyX TM ARC.…”

“…[4,6,7] SRCs have recently won over dental clinicians due to benefits such as the simplification of clinical steps, low incidence of post-operative sensitivity, and early clinical success. [4,8] Numerous previous studies have compared the adhesive qualities of SRCs to tooth [5,[9][10][11][12] and to various dental restorative materials [13,14] with those of traditional resin luting cements and water-based cements. However, studies on the bond strength of SRCs to dentin appear inconsistent.…”