Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites and Glass Ionomer Cements to Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies

Abstract

Background: Conventional composites are largely used in pediatric restorative dentistry and demonstrate successful clinical outcomes. However, the need for simplification of operative steps in young or uncooperative children demands reliable alternatives. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the in vitro bond strength of glass ionomer cements (GICs) and self-adhesive flowable composites (SFCs) on deciduous teeth. Methods: A comprehensive literature search according to the PRISMA checklist was manually and electronically performed by two independent reviewers through the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase, to include in vitro studies comparing GICs and SFCs bond strength values of restorations on primary teeth. In addition, three groups of meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Results: Three articles meeting the inclusion criteria were selected and subjected to both qualitative and quantitative assessment. No statistically significant difference was found between SFC versus GIC; however, both groups significantly differed with conventional flowable composites (CFs). Conclusions: Despite the absence of significant difference in bond strength values, SFCs may be considered a valid alternative to GICs in the restoration of deciduous teeth, although CFs proved better in vitro performances.

Adhesive Bond Integrity of Experimental Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Incorporated Dentin Adhesive: An SEM, EDX, μTBS, and Rheometric Analysis

“…The composition of dentin adhesives has been improved in the last few decades to improve their bonding capabilities [ 6 ]. This compositional change has improved the quality of the chemical bonds formed between adhesive and hydroxyapatite (HA) minerals of enamel or dentin [ 7 ]. However, despite the augmentations in the adhesive's composition, an adhesive that provides an ideal seal and optimum properties is still being pursued [ 8 ].…”

Hall technique for primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…In general, MID techniques such as ART and SDF have shown very respectable success rates when compared with conventional restorations, particularly for single surface occlusal carious lesions [28] . Moreover, with the development of new materials, conventional restorative techniques may lead to improved clinical outcomes over time [29] . However, when it comes to proximal or multi-surface lesions, the success rate of ART suffers.…”

Influence of etching mode on bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable resin composites to bovine teeth

“…The primary advantage of SARs is their convenience and rapid application, but their high viscosity and low ability to wet the tooth surface for proper demineralization and penetration into the tooth structure may affect their bonding performance 8) . Previous reports have shown that SARs are unable to establish comparable bonds to tooth hard tissues for short or long periods of time compared to conventional bonding systems or resin composite restorations 5) .…”