Bond strength of primer/cement systems to zirconia subjected to artificial aging

Li, Zhao; Jian, Yutao; Wang, Xiaodong

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.020

Cited by 53 publications

(60 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Seven different indirect substrates were considered in this review. These included lithium disilicate ceramic, 20,22,23,25,28‐39 yttrium‐stabilized zirconium dioxide ceramic, 20 ‐22, 24,27,32,37,40‐53 leucite‐reinforced ceramic, 20,54‐56 feldspathic porcelain, 32,59 polymer infiltrated ceramic material, 19,58 resin composite, 20,26,29,57,59‐66 and metal alloys 67–69 . The characteristics of these studies are summarized in Table 2.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The findings in the present review demonstrated higher bond strength values when universal adhesives were used instead of the material‐specific primer. The superiority in the bond strength promoted by the universal adhesives may be explained due the presence of some functional components other than MDP 49 . Universal adhesives contain dimethacrylates and other additives that enhances the mechanical properties of the polymer and give it certain hydrophobicity, consequently improving the bonding properties, especially in the long‐term 82 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta‐Analysis of in Vitro Studies

Cuevas‐Suárez

Rosa

Vitti

et al. 2020

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To evaluate the in vitro bond strength of universal adhesive systems to indirect substrates. Material and Methods: Two reviewers performed a literature search up to March 2018 in seven databases: PubMed, Web of Science, SciELO, Scopus, LILACS, IBECS, and BBO. The review included studies that compared the bond strength of universal adhesives and well-established material-specific primers to indirect substrates: lithium disilicate ceramic, yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide ceramic, leucite-reinforced ceramic, feldspathic porcelain, polymer infiltrated ceramic material, resin composite or metal alloys. Analyses were carried out using RevMan 5.3.5. A global comparison was performed with the standardized mean difference using a random-effects models at a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: A total of 45 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and the meta-analysis was performed with 42 studies. Bond strength to glass-based ceramics and alloys was improved with the use of a specific-primer as separate step before the bonding procedures (lithium disilicate, p < 0.001; alloys, p < 0.001). The bond strength to zirconium substrates was improved with the use of universal adhesives (p < 0.001). For bond strength to composite resin as indirect substrate, universal adhesives performed in a manner similar to that of the material-specific primer (p = 0.11). Conclusions:The clinical procedure of luting zirconia and resin composite restorations could be simplified by using single-bottle universal adhesives. However, the ability of universal adhesives to achieve an adequate and durable bond to glass-based ceramics and alloys appears to be limited.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta‐Analysis of in Vitro Studies

Cuevas‐Suárez

Rosa

Vitti

et al. 2020

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, conventional resin-based luting agents without functional monomers combined with other adhesives also have been used for bonding to zirconia [8,9]. Conventional resin-based luting agents combined with primer containing 10-MDP or a general binder can also improve the bond strength to zirconia [10]. Therefore, the present bonding strategy of combining the application of airborne-particle abrasion and primer or a resin-based luting agent containing acidic functional monomers (e.g., 10-MDP) is a preferred method for zirconia bonding [11,12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating the shear bond strength of five resin-based luting agents to zirconia ceramics

Liu

Jiang

et al. 2020

J Oral Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study investigated the bond strength and aging resistance performance of five resin-based luting agents to zirconia. A total of 100 large blocks (10.0 mm × 10.0 mm × 2.5 mm) and 100 small blocks (4.0 mm × 4.0 mm × 2.5 mm) of zirconia were airborne-particle abraded and randomly divided into five groups: (RelyX Ultimate [RUl]; Panavia F [PF]; Clearfil SA Luting [SAC]; Multilink Speed [MS]; and RelyX Unicem [RUn]). The small blocks were bonded to the large blocks using the resin-based luting agents. Shear bond strengths (SBS) and failure mode were determined before and after 5,000 thermocycles. After being stored in water for 24 h, the SBS were MS > PF > RUl > SAC > RUn (P < 0.05). After 5,000 thermocycles, the SBS were MS > SAC ≈ RUl > PF ≈ RUn (P < 0.05); the SBS of the PF, MS, and RUn groups were lower than that before 5,000 thermocycles (P < 0.01). Adhesive failure, cohesive failure, or mixed failure occurred in the specimens. In general, Clearfil SA Luting, a self-adhesive resin-based luting agent containing 10-methacryloxy decyl diphosphate, had good initial and durable SBS to zirconia and was a better adhesive.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, zirconia does not allow mechanical/chemical bond to Rc using HF and silane. To this end, a bifunctional organic molecule MDP (10-Methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate) monomer [9][10][11] is required: ester phosphate monomer bonds to the oxides (such as zirconia oxide) [12] and the other groups copolymerize with the resin matrix of cements. However, the chemical reactions formed between hydroxyl groups of the MDP monomer and those groups on the zirconia ceramic surface can be weakened after thermal cycling [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recently, a new universal adhesive-resin cement (Ua+Rc) combination (resin cement RelyX™ Ultimate 3M ESPE; Scotchbond™ Universal 3M ESPE) recommended for glassceramic cementation presented good results for bond strength to zirconia after aging [11]. All the primers for indirect restorations, such as MDP, silane, and adhesive, compose that combination.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bond strength to ZLS ceramics at different etching times and cementation protocols after aging

Thiesen¹,

Souza²,

Schmitt³

et al. 2019

BDS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To assess the influence of 5% hydrofluoric acid etching time (ET), cementation protocol (CP), and thermal cycling (TC) aging on the microshear bond strength (µSBS) of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLS) to adhesive resin cement. Material and Methods: Ten VITA Suprinity® ceramic blocks were cut in 120 slices (1.4 mm thickness) and randomly assigned to 12 groups (n = 10) according to the combination of factors (2x3x2 design): etching time (20 or 30 s), cementation protocol (silane + universal adhesive + resin cement; universal adhesive + resin cement; silane + resin cement) and thermal cycling (cycled or no-cycled). RelyX Ceramic Primer and Scotchbond™ Universal Adhesive were used respectively as silane (S) and universal adhesive (Ua). Ceramic surface was etched, and the cementation protocol performed on the delimited bonding area. Then, resin cement (RelyX™ Ultimate Cement [Rc]) cylinders were bonded and light cured. After, specimens were stored in deionized water at 37°C for 7 days and subjected to the µSBS test. Results: Data passed the normality test and three-way ANOVA analysis showed statistical difference (p<0.01) for isolated; double (ET/TC) (p<0.05), and triple (p<0.05) factor interactions. Conclusion: The combination 30s etching-Ua-Rc presented higher adhesive bond strength after thermal aging.

show abstract

Bond strength of primer/cement systems to zirconia subjected to artificial aging

Cited by 53 publications

References 21 publications

Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta‐Analysis of in Vitro Studies

Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta‐Analysis of in Vitro Studies

Investigating the shear bond strength of five resin-based luting agents to zirconia ceramics

Bond strength to ZLS ceramics at different etching times and cementation protocols after aging

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About