2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond–slip on CFRP/GFRP-to-concrete joints subjected to moisture, salt fog and temperature cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
8
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fracture energy is the area under the local shear stresslocal bond slip curve, which represents the energy per unit of bonded area required to fracture the interface. It can be seen from Figure 16 that (a) the shape of these curves is similar to that observed by Nakaba et al (2001) and Silva et al (2013); (b) the ascending branches of different curves are very close to each other, implying the initial stiffness of the joint being not affected by the aging in the salt water; and (c) the difference between the descending branches of different curves is significant, meanwhile the fracture energy of the joint generally increases with the increase in the immersion time.…”
Section: Afrp-to-concrete Joint Specimenssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The fracture energy is the area under the local shear stresslocal bond slip curve, which represents the energy per unit of bonded area required to fracture the interface. It can be seen from Figure 16 that (a) the shape of these curves is similar to that observed by Nakaba et al (2001) and Silva et al (2013); (b) the ascending branches of different curves are very close to each other, implying the initial stiffness of the joint being not affected by the aging in the salt water; and (c) the difference between the descending branches of different curves is significant, meanwhile the fracture energy of the joint generally increases with the increase in the immersion time.…”
Section: Afrp-to-concrete Joint Specimenssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Environmental reduction factors were usually adopted in codes and literatures to consider the durability under harsh environment exposure, as follow: Gf,env=αGnormalf where G f, env is the fracture energy under the harsh environment exposure; α is a corrective coefficient that adjusts the value of fracture energy to that determined for the wet–dry cycles and sustained loading exposure. The reduction factors for the fracture energy under dry–wet cycles were given as 1.09 in literature because the fracture energy showed significant increases for dry–wet cycles in his results, but this is obviously not in accordance with the experimental results of this paper. Therefore, the value of the coefficient given by him is not applicable to this paper and need to be determined.…”
Section: Discussion Of Fracture Energy Gfcontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…A 2‐year experimental exposure program performed by Dai et al indicated that interfacial tensile bond strength degraded after wet–dry cycling because of the formation of microcracks at the primer‐to‐concrete interface. Silva et al carried out an experimental study on the deterioration of FRP–concrete interface under dry–wet cycles with salt water. Surprisingly, the results indicated that the maximum strain in the composite and the fracture energy showed significant increases under dry–wet cycles exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several models [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] were proposed considering the effects of aggressive environments (such as sulphate attack, temperature change, or wet-dry cycles) on interfacial behavior, no direct models were provided for FRP-concrete interfaces after exposure to natural subtropical climates. In some models [25,26,29,30,34], the maximum stress (τ f ) and the slip (δ 1 ) corresponding to maximum stress were revised.…”
Section: Natural Exposure Effect On Bond-slip Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%