1966
DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.20-1885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond-length/Dihedral-angle and Bond-length/Bond-order Relationships for Sulphur(II)-Sulphur(II) Bonds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-a]-s-t riazi ne 2,4,5-Trichloro-6-(methylthio)isophthalonitrile 3,3'-Trithiobis-(2,4-pentanedione) 2,2'-Dithiobis-(l-phenyl-l,3-butanedione) 3,3'-Dithiobis-(2,4-pentanedione) Power & Jones (1971c) This study The S(1)-S(2) distance of 2.082 (2) A is slightly longer than that anticipated from the plot of S-S bond length versus the -C-S-S-C-torsion angle (Hordvik, 1966). The torsion angle in this study is 68.6 °.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…-a]-s-t riazi ne 2,4,5-Trichloro-6-(methylthio)isophthalonitrile 3,3'-Trithiobis-(2,4-pentanedione) 2,2'-Dithiobis-(l-phenyl-l,3-butanedione) 3,3'-Dithiobis-(2,4-pentanedione) Power & Jones (1971c) This study The S(1)-S(2) distance of 2.082 (2) A is slightly longer than that anticipated from the plot of S-S bond length versus the -C-S-S-C-torsion angle (Hordvik, 1966). The torsion angle in this study is 68.6 °.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Perhaps more significant is that the Te-Te-Te-Te dihedral angle of 99.9 (1) ° in the Ph4 P+ structure is considerably smaller than the present value of 105.3 (1) °. As noted by Hordvik (1966) there is a correlation between disulfide bond lengths and dihedral angles (presumably due to eclipsing of lone pairs on the chalogen atoms involved) and this may be responsible for the longer bond lengths in the Ph4 P÷ salt. Unfortunately the dihedral angles in the Te 2-salt are not readily available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bond length differs significantly from those usually found in aliphatic disulfides with dihedral angles near to 90 ° (Hordvik, 1966;Lee, 1972;Lee & Bryant, 1970;Lee & Bryant, 1969aOttersen, Warner & Serf, 1973b). The sulfur-sulfur bond lengths reported for dicinnamyl disulfide (lee & Bryant, 1971) and dibenzyl disulfide (Lee & Bryant, 1969b;van Dijk & Visser, 1971) are 2.01 (1) and 2.02 (1) A, with CSSC dihedral angles of 66.4 and 92.1 °, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The sulfur-sulfur bond lengths reported for dicinnamyl disulfide (lee & Bryant, 1971) and dibenzyl disulfide (Lee & Bryant, 1969b;van Dijk & Visser, 1971) are 2.01 (1) and 2.02 (1) A, with CSSC dihedral angles of 66.4 and 92.1 °, respectively. Hordvik (1966) gives 2.03-2.05 A as the expected length of an aliphatic S-S bond. Although CSSC dihedral angles of 105 to 110 ° have been reported (Foss, Johnsen & Tvedten, 1958;Foss & Johnsen, 1965;Oughton & Harrison, 1959), values between 80 and 100 ° (Hordvik, 1966;Lee & Bryant, 1969) are usually observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation