2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11172-010-0182-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond energies and the enthalpies of formation of mono- and polyradicals in nitroalkanes 2. Nitro derivatives of ethane and propane

Abstract: Based on the experimental results and the published data, the enthalpies of formation of ethane and propane nitro derivatives were obtained for both the standard state and gas phase. The bond dissociation energies of the ethane and propane nitro derivatives were calculated using the enthalpies of atomization and the energies of nonvalent interactions of nitro groups. The calculated values were compared with the kinetic data on thermal decomposition. The bond dissociation energies in radicals of the ethane and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(7 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated Δ f H 298 o (g) values for 19−22, 26, 28, and 29 are in internal consistency with the experimental data for mononitroalkanes (1−8), dinitroalkanes (10−18), and tetranitroalkanes (23)(24)(25)27), and thus the theoretical gas-phase enthalpies of formation are recommended for 19 −22, 26, 28, and 29 in Table 2 rather than the experimental data. On the basis of these values and the experimental condensed phase enthalpies of formation, the new values of enthalpy of vaporization or sublimation are recommended in Table 2 Among the seven cyclic and polycyclic nitro compounds (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36), the largest difference of 47 kJ·mol −1 is revealed between the experimental and calculated Δ f H 298 o (g) values of 1,1-dinitrocyclopropane (32). Evidence of experimental error for 32 was derived from the results of isodesmic reaction calculations (see Table S2 of Supporting Information).…”
Section: Journal Of Chemical and Engineering Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculated Δ f H 298 o (g) values for 19−22, 26, 28, and 29 are in internal consistency with the experimental data for mononitroalkanes (1−8), dinitroalkanes (10−18), and tetranitroalkanes (23)(24)(25)27), and thus the theoretical gas-phase enthalpies of formation are recommended for 19 −22, 26, 28, and 29 in Table 2 rather than the experimental data. On the basis of these values and the experimental condensed phase enthalpies of formation, the new values of enthalpy of vaporization or sublimation are recommended in Table 2 Among the seven cyclic and polycyclic nitro compounds (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36), the largest difference of 47 kJ·mol −1 is revealed between the experimental and calculated Δ f H 298 o (g) values of 1,1-dinitrocyclopropane (32). Evidence of experimental error for 32 was derived from the results of isodesmic reaction calculations (see Table S2 of Supporting Information).…”
Section: Journal Of Chemical and Engineering Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“… a Values calculated from isodesmic reactions are given. b Calculated in this work using the relationships between condensed and gas phase enthalpies of formation: Δ f H 298 o (l) + Δ vap H 298 o = Δ f H 298 o (g) or Δ f H 298 o (cr) + Δ sub H 298 o = Δ f H 298 o (g). c Reference . d Reference . e Estimated on the basis of experimental Δ vap H 298 o values for nitromethane and trinitromethane. f (323 to 353) K. g Estimation. h Reference . i Reference . j G4­(MP2) energies were used in the isodesmic reaction calculations. k Reference . l The value of Δ f H 298 o (cr) = 83.7 kJ·mol –1 is given by the authors, however, a different value, 108.0 kJ·mol –1 , is obtained from the enthalpy of combustion given in ref . m Estimated from empirical equation. n Reference . o Reference . p Reference . q Reference . r Reference . s The enthalpy of sublimation at 373.7 K (ref ) was recalculated to 298.15 K using the C p ,298 o (cr) = 218.0 J·K –1 ·mol –1 (ref ) and C p ,298 o (g) = 171.7 J·K –1 ·mol –1 calculated in this work. t Interpolated from the enthalpies of formation of methyldinitramine ( 50 ) and n -butyldinitramine ( 53 ). u Reference . v Obtained using MP2/cc-pVTZ calculations and the estimated value of Δ sub H 298 o ; this value leads to reasonable agreement with the experimental enthalpy of combustion determined in ref . w Assumed to be equal to the enthalpy of sublimation of biuret. x Estimated by comparison with related compounds, see ref . …”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The D f H 298 values were calculated from isodesmic reactions for some other compounds (3,10,14,17) with considerable deviations from experiment. However, for these compounds (Table 5), the results from isodesmic reactions are very close to the experimental values.…”
Section: Nitro Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2); fairly accurate estimates of the formation enthalpies of mononitroalkanes have been obtained [4][5][6][7]. Accuracy of the estimates of formation enthalpies of the hydrocarbon radicals required for calculation of D(C-N) has been much worse: the two poorly correlated sets of values have been reported in the literature [8][9][10], the difference between the values often exceeding 12-15 kJ/mol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%