“…In this context, we have further investigated the possibility that the discrepancy could arise due to af ailure in either the threshold CID experiment, or the deconvolution of the experimental data by the L-CID program. To this end, we designed controle xperimentsw ith several models ystems to test the scalingoft he experimental methods with the size of the molecule, and also to isolatet he contribution of Londond ispersion, [52] the latter noncovalenti nteraction being the objecto ft he D3 correction applied to DFTc alculations. Thec ontrole xperiments revealed that the L-CID deconvolution of the T-CID experiment operates correctly for both small and large ions within the tested range and agreesw ith the calculated BDEs, with the fairly trivial proviso that the structures of the initial ion, as well as its dissociation products, have to be correct.T urning to potential issues with the computational results, the present results suggest a resolution of the previously observed discrepancy:good agreement with MeCbi + and poor agreement with AdoCbi + .A ni nsufficiently accurate consideration of the interactions among the side-chains themselves, and between the side-chains and the cleavable group on Co, most certainly impactst he result for the large adenosyl moiety,w ith its conformational flexibility,i ts hydrogen-bonding functionalities, and its extended psystem,a ll presenting possibilities for non-covalent interactions.…”