2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond behaviour of reinforcement in self-compacting concretes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of conventional tensile and flexural tests, to characterize the adhesion, it should be mentioned that various researchers have achieved variable or even contradictory results, but it seems nevertheless that the adhesion between the concrete and the steel reinforcement is higher for SCCs than for VCs [27,28]. In particular, Valcuende and Parra [29] studied the adhesion between (SCC/Steel) and (VC/Steel) couples, for different water to binder ratios (w/b), different compressive strength values and Steel bar with 16mm diameter. These authors observed that the mean Normalized bond strength (τ max /fc ½ ) is greater for the (SCC/Steel) couples than for the (VC/Steel) couples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of conventional tensile and flexural tests, to characterize the adhesion, it should be mentioned that various researchers have achieved variable or even contradictory results, but it seems nevertheless that the adhesion between the concrete and the steel reinforcement is higher for SCCs than for VCs [27,28]. In particular, Valcuende and Parra [29] studied the adhesion between (SCC/Steel) and (VC/Steel) couples, for different water to binder ratios (w/b), different compressive strength values and Steel bar with 16mm diameter. These authors observed that the mean Normalized bond strength (τ max /fc ½ ) is greater for the (SCC/Steel) couples than for the (VC/Steel) couples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature shows extensive investigations on fresh and mechanical properties (compressive, splitting tensile, and flexural strengths as well as modulus of elasticity, shrinkage and bond strength) of SCC including their comparison with that of CVC (Soleymani Ashtiani et al, 2011, Soleymani Ashtiani et al, 2010, Desnerck et al, 2010, Valcuende et al, 2009, De Almeida Filho et al, 2008, Domone, 2006, Persson, 2001). In addition, researchers have been working on the structural performance in RC members cast with SCC under monotonic loads in the past few years (Hassan et al, 2008, Lachemi et al, 2005, Sonebi et al, 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both groups concluded that no significant differences were observed between SCC and CC in terms of bond strength development. However, other studies (Dehn et al 2000;Chan et al 2003;Castel et al 2006;Valcuende and Parra 2009) have shown that SCC has higher bond strength and less top-bar effect compared with CC. These discrepancies merit additional research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%