Proceedings of the 12th International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry 2008
DOI: 10.3390/ecsoc-12-01275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond-Based 3D-Chiral Linear Indices: Theory and QSAR Applications to Central Chirality Codification

Abstract: The recently introduced non-stochastic and stochastic bond-based linear indices are been generalized to codify chemical structure information for chiral drugs, making use of a trigonometric 3D-chirality correction factor. These improved modified descriptors are applied to several well-known data sets to validate each one of them. Particularly, Cramer's steroid data set has become a benchmark for the assessment of novel quantitative structure activity relationship methods. This data set has been used by several… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where N is the number of cases (C and nC), R c is the canonical regression coefficient, U is the Wilk's statistics, F is the Fisher's statistics and p is the p-level (probability of error). The above results are typically considered as excellent in the literature for LDA-QPDR/QSAR models (Castillo-Garit et al, 2008;Estrada and Molina, 2001;Marrero-Ponce et al, 2004;Morales et al, 2006;Vilar et al, 2008). In order to check the variation of this model with the training/CV sets, we carried on a CV study by using ten totally random sets, including the initial one from the actual model (with the same 75% training and 25% CV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…where N is the number of cases (C and nC), R c is the canonical regression coefficient, U is the Wilk's statistics, F is the Fisher's statistics and p is the p-level (probability of error). The above results are typically considered as excellent in the literature for LDA-QPDR/QSAR models (Castillo-Garit et al, 2008;Estrada and Molina, 2001;Marrero-Ponce et al, 2004;Morales et al, 2006;Vilar et al, 2008). In order to check the variation of this model with the training/CV sets, we carried on a CV study by using ten totally random sets, including the initial one from the actual model (with the same 75% training and 25% CV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In fact, this scheme has been successfully applied to the prediction of several physical, physicochemical, chemical, pharmacokinetical, toxicological as well as biological properties (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Furthermore, these molecular descriptors (MDs) have been extended to consider three-dimensional (3D) features of small-⁄ medium-sized molecules based on the trigonometric-3D-chirality-correction factor approach (26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%