2017
DOI: 10.1108/rpj-03-2016-0050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond and part strength in fused deposition modeling

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the factors governing bond strength in fused deposition modeling (FDM) compared to strength in the fiber direction. Design/methodology/approach Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) boxes with the thickness of a single fiber were made at different platform and nozzle temperatures, print speeds, fiber widths and layer heights to produce multiple specimens for measuring the strength. Findings Specimens produced with the fibers oriented in the tensile direct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
140
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
10
140
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a clear manifestation of the conclusion mentioned above, that the tear energy is rather sensitive to temperature, but less so to print speed, similar to the tensile results from Coogan and Kazmer. 57 As weld time increases the tear energy increases, however, the bulk value is not reached; it does not exceed 70 % of the bulk value. This underperformance is also seen in comparisons of injection molded and ME manufactured ABS tensile, flexural samples where ME samples are 30 % to 70 % the strength of injection counterparts 58 , and in ULTEM 4 tensile samples where the z-axis tensile strength is 50 % of the injection molded counterpart.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is a clear manifestation of the conclusion mentioned above, that the tear energy is rather sensitive to temperature, but less so to print speed, similar to the tensile results from Coogan and Kazmer. 57 As weld time increases the tear energy increases, however, the bulk value is not reached; it does not exceed 70 % of the bulk value. This underperformance is also seen in comparisons of injection molded and ME manufactured ABS tensile, flexural samples where ME samples are 30 % to 70 % the strength of injection counterparts 58 , and in ULTEM 4 tensile samples where the z-axis tensile strength is 50 % of the injection molded counterpart.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[1–4] Most AM processes, such as laser sintering, photopolymerization/stereolithography, or material extrusion-based techniques, involve the creation of welds, which are inherent weak points in the parts. [5–7] As AM techniques continue to increase in popularity, facile methods that enable the quantification of the mechanical strength of these bonds or welds must be developed. [6]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor mechanical performance, relative to non‐AM parts, and anisotropic properties are widely reported in the literature . Additionally, mechanical property dependence on build orientation, air gap, raster angle, extruder temperature, and layer thickness have also been reported …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%